ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tom Newton <Tom.New...@gtl.com>
Subject RE: [RFE] Richer Task Specification
Date Fri, 16 Jun 2000 08:43:32 GMT
This sounds like a good solution to me.  It would solve our "two phase
build" problem very nicely.  If nobody else steps up, I might make a start
on this, but unfortunately I can't make any commitments :(

Tom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rubys@us.ibm.com [mailto:rubys@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: 16 June 2000 01:47
> To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [RFE] Richer Task Specification 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I've thought about this a bit more, and was wondering what 
> people think
> about the following idea.
> 
> How about a new task which subclasses off of javac.  Its init 
> method calls
> super.init(), then super.execute(), then loads and generated 
> class files
> and defines them as new tasks?
> 
> Nested taskdef elements, with identical syntax to the current 
> taskdef task,
> could be used to generate the necessary <include> statements 
> on the javac
> and then to define the mapping between classname and task name.  Users
> could obviously add their own <include> statements if necessary.
> 
> - Sam Ruby
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message