Return-Path: <Arnout.Kuiper@nl.origin-it.com>
Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 22644 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2000 09:09:58 -0000
Received: from gw-nl1.origin-it.com (@193.79.128.34)
  by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Apr 2000 09:09:58 -0000
Received: from mail.nl.origin-it.com (localhost.origin-it.com [127.0.0.1])
          by gw-nl1.origin-it.com with ESMTP id LAA01041
          for <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>;
 Wed, 19 Apr 2000 11:09:56 +0200 (MEST)
          (envelope-from Arnout.Kuiper@nl.origin-it.com)
Received: from mail.nl.origin-it.com(172.16.127.67) by gw-nl1.origin-it.com
 via mwrap (4.0a)
	id xma001039; Wed, 19 Apr 00 11:09:56 +0200
Received: from nlehx900.ehvovh.nl.origin-it.com
 (nlehx900.ehvovh.nl.origin-it.com [172.16.92.111])
	by mail.nl.origin-it.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id LAA08228
	for <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 2000 11:09:55 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: by nlehx900.ehvovh.nl.origin-it.com with Internet Mail Service
 (5.5.2448.0)
	id <JHJAZN40>; Wed, 19 Apr 2000 11:09:54 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <E1B81A5627BAD01191B500805FC16B0E77AB48@nlnwx001.nwgbak.nl.origin-it.com>
From: "Kuiper, Arnout" <Arnout.Kuiper@nl.origin-it.com>
To: "'ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org'" <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Ant Principles
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 11:09:37 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@bost.de]
> But the main question - to mee at least - is, do we need Java 2
> features at all? 

Well you don't _need_ them, but they make life a lot easier IMHO.
I like, for instance, using Collections instead of just the plain
old Vector. Also the javadoc 1.1/1.2 problems are out of the way.

My 2 cents,

  Arnout