Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 37715 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2000 23:24:51 -0000 Received: from f102.law4.hotmail.com (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.149.102) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2000 23:24:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 86906 invoked by uid 0); 22 Mar 2000 23:24:25 -0000 Message-ID: <20000322232425.86905.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 148.88.17.28 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 15:24:25 PST X-Originating-IP: [148.88.17.28] From: "Robin Green" To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: RE: [PATCH] Support for multiple source paths in javac Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 23:24:25 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > In short, we are slowly accumulating a patchwork quilt of ad-hoc > > mechanisms. > > > > I'd like to propose that in all cases we support nested XML elements. [snip] >I find the alternative, delimited attribute approach is often more concise. Agreed. >Should we always support that? Also if we are going to support it, we >should >agree on a single delimiter (or set of delimiters, if necessary). A common >method to tokenize such delimited lists would then be possible. Naturally I >vote for the comma as delimiter :-) +1 : is bad on win32, ; may be confused with : (I've done it before!) Comma is unconfusing and shouldn't be used within filenames, so no problems there. ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com