From burton@relativity.yi.org Tue Jan 18 22:12:57 2000 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 11772 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2000 22:12:57 -0000 Received: from universe.kendara.com (131.161.52.92) by 63.211.145.10 with SMTP; 18 Jan 2000 22:12:57 -0000 Received: from relativity.yi.org (IDENT:root@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by universe.kendara.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA30613 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:13:02 -0800 Sender: root@universe.kendara.com Message-ID: <3884E56E.49365B31@relativity.yi.org> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:13:02 -0800 From: "Kevin A. Burton" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12-20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: Ant & Javadoc, jdk specific? References: <8525686A.00626ADB.00@d54mta04.raleigh.ibm.com> <3884C8D1.C5CE88FA@acmerocket.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Paul Philion wrote: > > Sam and Kevin - > > Oops... I've already started porting javadoc to a stand alone "javadoc" > call. Further, I've found a number of problems with the package name > pattern matching stuff. > > Who wants this? Or I can do it. Rock on. First come first serve :) > (As background: I was getting log4j set up with ant, and I decided to > try the javadoc option. So I got sidetracked and spent several hours > last night trying to clean up Javadoc.java instead of building wrappers > for log4j.) > > - Paul Philion Why are we using log4j within Ant? -- Kevin A Burton Senior Software Engineer Kendara Inc http://www.kendara.com Mobile: 408-910-6145 Linux - The revolution will NOT be televised