annotator-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benjamin Young <>
Subject RE: Annotator's almost incubating...I think ;)
Date Mon, 12 Sep 2016 15:16:04 GMT
This is great info, Nick! Thank you. :D Also excited to be talking on this list. ^_^

So. That XML file was created by me from a copy/paste of someone else’s file (Abdera’s..maybe)
within the CMS. It’s likely my loverly little Windows 10 Surface Pro 2 introduced some of
that… Hoping editing from here on won’t cause issues…

I’ll get folks invited over here from the old list and we can get to work
on deciding how to do the web site. I found this post educational:

Are there anything else we need to be ready for (besides needing SVN to push changes and/or
using the CMS side/bookmarklet)?

The site right now—which I’d like to port over and re-brand is in GitHub at present:

Is there a way we could hook post-commit hooks into a git repo for that at the ASF?

(so many questions…sorry).

Thanks, Nick!



From: Nick Kew<>
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2016 6:11 AM
To: Benjamin Young<>
Subject: Re: Annotator's almost incubating...I think ;)

On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 12:27:40 +0000
Benjamin Young <> wrote:

> [chop - message not mine to post in public, so I'll
   just see if I can answer questions]

The dev mailinglist, where we should be discussing this,
can be seen at
I don't know why it's not listed on the front page: it's
probably awaiting some batch update.  I expect Humbedooh will know.

Regarding the incubator status page (404 from )
creating that is a mentor job.  I just looked, someone's
created a placeholder annotator.xml, from which it should
be generated.  However, some bogus whitespace invalidates
the XML, which is probably why it hasn't appeared.  I just
fixed that, though the contents still need work (some of
them depend on project decisions, like svn vs git).

The podling website is another job.  There's a decision to be
made: use svnpubsub or apache CMS (if available - last time I
tried it was apparently in an indeterminate state).  Ideally
we should look for consensus before creating it.

Nick Kew

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message