Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ambari-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ambari-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF51410B6F for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 20:46:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18541 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2014 20:46:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ambari-user-archive@ambari.apache.org Received: (qmail 18476 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2014 20:46:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ambari.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ambari.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ambari.apache.org Received: (qmail 18462 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2014 20:46:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 20:46:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eyeofthefrog@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.178] (HELO mail-vc0-f178.google.com) (209.85.220.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 20:46:33 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id im17so1614096vcb.23 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 13:46:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=wIUv7llkWeEerIO8+/1CFWdZyNjl1i9X1lqpTX9b8is=; b=mg8j/afimYIIz9pf41euTfz5HJo8NTbWE/S3bC5rO79WXyWqwYZSn1zp4Z0PdBK5wL LTsUF0ejEgi8IP3HcH8ta2tvqonRQQ0LvvfJUFIgPpZWxot/CLZff4uax1dCaieL5T++ Q7SsXSzpijRlv7Dzqj1LJj51d1DDlGU+ioBGdDbkHecNKrMtjkFkFEWNn9If9PKn62xn apyHwcdBER55l95XV6KbrfwF1z6pnkvOgrYzfQeUr6fhW2MVhutIF5Gne7MkasIaCV7Z YYo4Rnr0Hz9XfEinkAsJYV7+GItYDgtdfT8MdlfOgLZH0ZHIiZRNgpJ1lNQEXGS+VF4y k6mA== X-Received: by 10.52.139.237 with SMTP id rb13mr5258999vdb.33.1395348372731; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 13:46:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: eyeofthefrog@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.187.6 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 13:45:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <660194538.3080019.1395344533286.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> From: Chris Mildebrandt Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 13:45:52 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: yIkBk4gSYb-MjMYwMNG9EhkCjuk Message-ID: Subject: Re: Creating new stacks and services....target 1.4.x or 1.5? To: user@ambari.apache.org Cc: "dev@ambari.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec52c5ccd183c1a04f50fdcbb X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec52c5ccd183c1a04f50fdcbb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thanks for the input Erin and Sumit, looks like I'll try the python route. Thanks! -Chris On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Sumit Mohanty wrote: > In fact the python support makes it much much easier to to add custom > services and custom scripts. So I will encourage you to try that and > provide feedback. > > Python support is at par with puppet support and so its mature.. > > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Erin Boyd wrote: > >> It's my understanding that the idea is to move away from puppet to Python >> in order to ease testing and deployment of singular components within the >> stack. >> I believe the release for 1.5.0 is going to be in April. >> I also believe the changes for python (using the new services >> architecture) has been back ported all the way to 1.3, therefore you shoudl >> be able to deploy those stacks using 1.5. >> >> Erin >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Chris Mildebrandt" >> To: user@ambari.apache.org, dev@ambari.apache.org >> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:21:12 PM >> Subject: Creating new stacks and services....target 1.4.x or 1.5? >> >> Hey all, >> >> We'd like to create a custom stack and scripts for managing components. >> From my initial searching, I see support for both puppet and python right >> now in the 1.5 branch, and 1.4.x is purely puppet. So, I have the >> following >> questions: >> >> 1) Does this reflect a movement away from puppet in the future, like in >> 1.6.x? >> 2) How mature will the python support be once 1.5 is released? >> 3) What is the expected release date of 1.5? >> 4) Will I continue to be able to deploy HDP 1.3.x and 2.0.x using Ambari >> 1.5? >> >> Since we're just starting out, I'd like to make sure we're moving in a >> direction that will be supported for quite some time. And personally I'd >> rather use python rather than puppet. Can someone shed some light on the >> direction so I can make an informed decision for my code? >> >> Thanks, >> -Chris >> > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity > to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately > and delete it from your system. Thank You. --bcaec52c5ccd183c1a04f50fdcbb Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks for the input Erin and Sumit, looks like I'll t= ry the python route.

Thanks!
-Chris


On Thu, Mar = 20, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Sumit Mohanty <smohanty@hortonworks.com&g= t; wrote:
In fact the python support = makes it much much easier to to add custom services and custom scripts. So = I will encourage you to try that and provide feedback.

Python support is at par with puppet support and so its= mature..


On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Erin Boyd <eboyd@redhat.= com> wrote:
It's my understanding that the idea is to move away from puppet to Pyth= on in order to ease testing and deployment of singular components within th= e stack.
I believe the release for 1.5.0 is going to be in April.
I also believe the changes for python (using the new services architecture)= has been back ported all the way to 1.3, therefore you shoudl be able to d= eploy those stacks using 1.5.

Erin


----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Mildebrandt" <chris@woodenrhino.com>
To: user@ambari= .apache.org, dev@ambari.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:21:12 PM
Subject: Creating new stacks and services....target 1.4.x or 1.5?

Hey all,

We'd like to create a custom stack and scripts for managing components.=
>From my initial searching, I see support for both puppet and python right now in the 1.5 branch, and 1.4.x is purely puppet. So, I have the following=
questions:

1) Does this reflect a movement away from puppet in the future, like in
1.6.x?
2) How mature will the python support be once 1.5 is released?
3) What is the expected release date of 1.5?
4) Will I continue to be able to deploy HDP 1.3.x and 2.0.x using Ambari 1.5?

Since we're just starting out, I'd like to make sure we're movi= ng in a
direction that will be supported for quite some time. And personally I'= d
rather use python rather than puppet. Can someone shed some light on the direction so I can make an informed decision for my code?

Thanks,
-Chris


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This= message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is= addressed and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and= exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message= is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any printing, = copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this comm= unication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication i= n error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your syst= em. Thank You.

--bcaec52c5ccd183c1a04f50fdcbb--