Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ambari-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ambari-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C123109FB for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19442 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2013 19:28:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ambari-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 19338 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2013 19:28:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ambari-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ambari-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ambari-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 19330 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2013 19:28:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 19:28:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mahadev@hortonworks.com designates 209.85.220.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.178] (HELO mail-vc0-f178.google.com) (209.85.220.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 19:28:42 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id ie18so4860981vcb.23 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:28:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ZanQ3PtiBayab6jCAx5CHHFfxj5XW8wzPSEZBBgQGDg=; b=ElBggLj9D8Y3XCXJW6WMJ2tSJ3EHAU2Fl4dwf0ORQgnyKn4BxI7RpXk85eCJz6aDRt nTY6UtsoIwLWBrFcAKaQ70H8sTHeRP6d4L2OtPOoZjKKE3lr9e6Kx97FoBU707qmpKJs fqxXwuV4+XM+elIw9qBvX+M3icn8/SBq3QGi8OgKI5PKF5H9xZp3Ge75hL9riJfXGm5j g6MDp69MKUKdjE918skeVP+H+mkANViTB3Jw/ulvUEHuPFSWxzvbE+eJzZ9VIf7maXjt TXX8bUuzYOxdhtrsesU+VFU0SqTP59zHfvSAJma+bnynUV3pokWsIKkRIeYfJPGeXP/h qhYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk1yFODsQpTIjmYRG5ZiboxFdnvBH/DTJCaXX4m2gW4oH6Hsr/AY2NXtsUFfw99OtAFN3UjsdLrHZpJsMWH+XfxrZ/AtBoYk4Tam8XY4XOODlYjBg8= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.163.165 with SMTP id yj5mr743795vdb.42.1383593302102; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:28:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.170.80 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:28:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9d23956.d9e7.14220fb857f.Coremail.casic_2010@126.com> References: <9d23956.d9e7.14220fb857f.Coremail.casic_2010@126.com> Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:28:22 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: what's the difference of RpcQueueTime_avg_time between NAMENODE and JOBTRACKER when they are installed in the same node? From: Mahadev Konar To: "ambari-user@incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Xion, This property is per java process for the NN and JT. It is not per host. thanks mahadev Mahadev Konar Hortonworks Inc. http://hortonworks.com/ On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 6:40 PM, xiong wrote: > Hi,everyone, > What's the difference of RpcQueueTime_avg_time between NAMENODE and > JOBTRACKER when they are installed in the same node? > Thank you! > > -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Thank You.