ambari-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jonathan Hurley (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (AMBARI-20646) Large Long Running Requests Can Slow Down the ActionScheduler
Date Fri, 31 Mar 2017 17:23:41 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-20646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Jonathan Hurley updated AMBARI-20646:
-------------------------------------
    Attachment: AMBARI-20646.patch

> Large Long Running Requests Can Slow Down the ActionScheduler
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-20646
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-20646
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ambari-server
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.0
>            Reporter: Jonathan Hurley
>            Assignee: Jonathan Hurley
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.5.1
>
>         Attachments: AMBARI-20646.patch
>
>
> When creating a massive request (a rolling upgrade on a cluster with 1000 nodes), the
size of the request seems to slow down the {{ActionScheduler}}. Each command was taking between
1 to 2 minutes to run (even server-side tasks). 
> The cause of this can be seen in the following two stack traces:
> {code:title=ActionSchedulerImpl}
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.orm.dao.DaoUtils.selectList(DaoUtils.java:60)
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.orm.dao.HostRoleCommandDAO.findByPKs(HostRoleCommandDAO.java:293)
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.orm.dao.HostRoleCommandDAO$$EnhancerByGuice$$21789cd1.CGLIB$findByPKs$7(<generated>)
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.orm.dao.HostRoleCommandDAO$$EnhancerByGuice$$21789cd1$$FastClassByGuice$$aa975e7f.invoke(<generated>)
> 	at com.google.inject.internal.cglib.proxy.$MethodProxy.invokeSuper(MethodProxy.java:228)
> 	at com.google.inject.internal.InterceptorStackCallback$InterceptedMethodInvocation.proceed(InterceptorStackCallback.java:72)
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.orm.AmbariLocalSessionInterceptor.invoke(AmbariLocalSessionInterceptor.java:53)
> 	at com.google.inject.internal.InterceptorStackCallback$InterceptedMethodInvocation.proceed(InterceptorStackCallback.java:72)
> 	at com.google.inject.internal.InterceptorStackCallback.intercept(InterceptorStackCallback.java:52)
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.orm.dao.HostRoleCommandDAO$$EnhancerByGuice$$21789cd1.findByPKs(<generated>)
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.actionmanager.ActionDBAccessorImpl.getTasks(ActionDBAccessorImpl.java:700)
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.actionmanager.ActionDBAccessorImpl.getTasks(ActionDBAccessorImpl.java:84)
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.actionmanager.Stage.<init>(Stage.java:157)
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.actionmanager.StageFactoryImpl.createExisting(StageFactoryImpl.java:72)
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.actionmanager.ActionDBAccessorImpl.getStagesInProgress(ActionDBAccessorImpl.java:303)
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.actionmanager.ActionScheduler.doWork(ActionScheduler.java:341)
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.actionmanager.ActionScheduler.run(ActionScheduler.java:302)
> 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> {code:title=Server Action Executor}
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.actionmanager.ActionDBAccessorImpl.getTasks(ActionDBAccessorImpl.java:700)
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.actionmanager.ActionDBAccessorImpl.getTasks(ActionDBAccessorImpl.java:84)
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.actionmanager.Stage.<init>(Stage.java:157)
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.actionmanager.StageFactoryImpl.createExisting(StageFactoryImpl.java:72)
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.actionmanager.Request.<init>(Request.java:199)
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.actionmanager.Request$$FastClassByGuice$$9071e03.newInstance(<generated>)
> 	at com.google.inject.internal.cglib.reflect.$FastConstructor.newInstance(FastConstructor.java:40)
> 	at com.google.inject.internal.DefaultConstructionProxyFactory$1.newInstance(DefaultConstructionProxyFactory.java:60)
> 	at com.google.inject.internal.ConstructorInjector.construct(ConstructorInjector.java:85)
> 	at com.google.inject.internal.ConstructorBindingImpl$Factory.get(ConstructorBindingImpl.java:254)
> 	at com.google.inject.internal.InjectorImpl$4$1.call(InjectorImpl.java:978)
> 	at com.google.inject.internal.InjectorImpl.callInContext(InjectorImpl.java:1024)
> 	at com.google.inject.internal.InjectorImpl$4.get(InjectorImpl.java:974)
> 	at com.google.inject.assistedinject.FactoryProvider2.invoke(FactoryProvider2.java:632)
> 	at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy26.createExisting(Unknown Source)
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.actionmanager.ActionDBAccessorImpl.getRequests(ActionDBAccessorImpl.java:784)
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.serveraction.ServerActionExecutor.cleanRequestShareDataContexts(ServerActionExecutor.java:259)
> 	- locked <0x00007ff0a14083c8> (a java.util.HashMap)
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.serveraction.ServerActionExecutor.doWork(ServerActionExecutor.java:454)
> 	at org.apache.ambari.server.serveraction.ServerActionExecutor$1.run(ServerActionExecutor.java:160)
> 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> It's clear from these stacks that every {{PENDING}} stage (roughly 15,000) were being
loaded into memory every second (and their accompanying task as well). This makes no sense
as these methods don't need all stages - just the _next_ stage. This is because all stages
are synchronous within a single request.
> The proposed solution is to fix the {{StageEntity.findByCommandStatuses}} call so it
doesn't return every stage:
> {code}
> SELECT stage.requestid, 
>        MIN(stage.stageid) 
> FROM   stageentity stage, 
>        hostrolecommandentity hrc 
> WHERE  hrc.status IN :statuses 
>        AND hrc.stageid = stage.stageid 
>        AND hrc.requestid = stage.requestid 
> GROUP  BY stage.requestid 
> {code}
> *Note that this might not appear on trunk due to AMBARI-18868*



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Mime
View raw message