Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0DF200C1E for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 19:24:11 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id B9FDF160B6B; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AF33160B61 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 19:24:10 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 4320 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2017 18:24:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@ambari.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ambari.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@ambari.apache.org Received: (qmail 4079 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2017 18:24:08 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 18:24:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1CD6A18C8F6 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:13:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.199 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.199 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rH7OW6Xe0j7X for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 353995FBB2 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8F711E0591 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:12:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id B1C6F25293 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:12:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: issues@ambari.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (AMBARI-19849) Recent workflows in Workflow designer should be in descending order of time of updation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 18:24:11 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-19849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850260#comment-15850260 ] Hudson commented on AMBARI-19849: --------------------------------- FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build Ambari-branch-2.5 #888 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-branch-2.5/888/]) AMBARI-19849. Recent workflows in Workflow designer should be in (pallavkul: [http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ambari.git&a=commit&h=ae4f0a94481b921a49f86f967352a130a5d378da]) * (edit) contrib/views/wfmanager/src/main/resources/ui/app/components/drafts-wf.js * (edit) contrib/views/wfmanager/src/main/resources/ui/app/components/designer-workspace.js > Recent workflows in Workflow designer should be in descending order of time of updation > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: AMBARI-19849 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-19849 > Project: Ambari > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ambari-views > Affects Versions: 2.5.0 > Reporter: venkat > Assignee: venkat > Fix For: 2.5.0 > > Attachments: AMBARI-19849_branch-2.5.patch > > > Recent workflows in Workflow designer should be in descending order of updated_at field both in recent list as well as Recent Projects screen. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)