ambari-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (AMBARI-18819) Ambari tab consuming lots of memory & cpu
Date Tue, 08 Nov 2016 12:17:58 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-18819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15647406#comment-15647406
] 

Hadoop QA commented on AMBARI-18819:
------------------------------------

{color:green}+1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12837957/AMBARI-18819.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 2 new or modified
test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of
javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number
of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in ambari-web.

Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/9177//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/9177//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Ambari tab consuming lots of memory & cpu
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-18819
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-18819
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ambari-web
>    Affects Versions: 2.5.0
>            Reporter: Andrii Tkach
>            Assignee: Andrii Tkach
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.5.0
>
>         Attachments: AMBARI-18819.patch, Screen Shot 2016-07-25 at 10.15.58 AM.png
>
>
> I have seen ambari tab taking close to 1 GB and a good amount of CPU. I am not sure if
this is expected. See the attached screenshot.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message