ambari-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Siddharth Wagle <swa...@hortonworks.com>
Subject [VOTE] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch
Date Fri, 02 Feb 2018 00:42:21 GMT
Hi all,

Thanks for voting on this thread, making it an official vote thread.

Thus far we have 8 +1's on the discussion thread.

2 PMCs
5 Committers
1 Contributors

BR,
Sid

________________________________________
From: Myroslav Papyrkovskyy <mpapyrkovskyy@hortonworks.com>
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 3:32 AM
To: dev@ambari.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

+1

Regards,
Myroslav Papirkovskyi

> 29 січ. 2018 р. о 10:36 Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan@gmail.com> написав(ла):
>
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>
> 2018년 1월 29일 (월) 오후 5:31, Vivek Ratnavel <vivekratnavel@apache.org>님이
작성:
>
>> +1
>>
>> -Vivek Ratnavel
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:51 PM, Nishant Bangarwa <
>> nbangarwa@hortonworks.com
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>> --
>>> Nishant Bangarwa
>>> Hortonworks
>>> (M): +91-9729200044 <+91%2097292%2000044>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/29/18, 10:20 AM, "Swapan Shridhar" <sshridhar@hortonworks.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for the splitting.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Swapan.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/28/18, 11:58 AM, "Don Bosco Durai" <bosco@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/28/18, 11:56 AM, "Dmytro Grinenko" <dgrinenko@hortonworks.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   +1
>>>>>
>>>>>   -----Original Message-----
>>>>>   From: Siddharth Wagle [mailto:swagle@hortonworks.com]
>>>>>   Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 7:19 AM
>>>>>   To: dev@ambari.apache.org
>>>>>   Subject: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and
>>> ambari-logsearch
>>>>>
>>>>>   Hi devs,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   We had a brief discussion about the release management of Ambari
>>> w.r.t to the new work that is on-going with Mpacks and multi-services,
>>> amongst the developers working on the respective pieces. The main point
>> of
>>> discussion was that although Metrics and LogSearch are sub-projects of
>>> Ambari, the release cadence of these sub-projects and Ambari core does
>> not
>>> have to be tied together. Having an Infra Mpack will allow changes to
>> these
>>> two modules to be published independently.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   The general consensus was to have separate repos for Ambari
>> Metrics,
>>> Ambari Log Search and Ambari Infra which would mean we can build and
>>> version these modules separately and simplify the release process. I
>> wanted
>>> to start a discuss/vote thread for this. I will follow this up with an
>>> Infra ticket to fork off the git repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari
>> LogSearch
>>> and Ambari Infra separate from the core codebase once we reach consensus.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   Note: These sub-projects do not have any compile-time or run-time
>>> dependencies on Ambari except logical dependency on Ambari stack advisor
>>> feature to configure the services correctly based on cluster resources.
>>> With the MPack effort this behavior will be delegated to individual stack
>>> services and the corresponding code will be housed in the service repos
>>> anyways. Ambari depends on Ambari Metrics at compile time on the
>>> ambari-metrics-common module which is already published to maven central
>>> and we would continue to do so if anything changes in the common library.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>   [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>   [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   Here is my +1 to start.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   Best Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>   Sid
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>

Mime
View raw message