Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ambari-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ambari-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 811B818E3A for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 23:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81601 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2015 23:12:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ambari-dev-archive@ambari.apache.org Received: (qmail 81518 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2015 23:12:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ambari.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ambari.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ambari.apache.org Received: (qmail 81348 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2015 23:12:46 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 23:12:46 +0000 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 23:12:46 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Levas (JIRA)" To: dev@ambari.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (AMBARI-9608) When adding the Oozie service to a kerberized cluster OOZIE_SERVER doesn't start MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-9608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14744474#comment-14744474 ] Robert Levas commented on AMBARI-9608: -------------------------------------- [~u39kun], Sorry about that. My previous comment should have read: Fixed with the resolution of AMBARI-9666. > When adding the Oozie service to a kerberized cluster OOZIE_SERVER doesn't start > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: AMBARI-9608 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-9608 > Project: Ambari > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Affects Versions: 2.0.0 > Reporter: John Speidel > Priority: Critical > Labels: keberos > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > > Oozie server fails to start with the error: "Fail: Configuration parameter 'oozie.service.HadoopAccessorService.kerberos.principal' was not found in configurations dictionary!" > Steps to reproduce: > Create a non-kerberized cluster > I used the following blueprint > {code} > { > "host_groups" : [ > { > "name" : "host_group_1", > "components" : [ > { > "name" : "NODEMANAGER" > }, > { > "name" : "NAMENODE" > }, > { > "name" : "HISTORYSERVER" > }, > { > "name" : "ZOOKEEPER_SERVER" > }, > { > "name" : "SECONDARY_NAMENODE" > }, > { > "name" : "RESOURCEMANAGER" > }, > { > "name" : "APP_TIMELINE_SERVER" > }, > { > "name" : "DATANODE" > }, > { > "name" : "YARN_CLIENT" > }, > { > "name" : "ZOOKEEPER_CLIENT" > }, > { > "name" : "MAPREDUCE2_CLIENT" > } > ], > "cardinality" : "1" > } > ], > "Blueprints" : { > "stack_name" : "HDP", > "stack_version" : "2.2" > } > } > {code} > - manually unzip UnlimitedJCEPolicy > - manually install MIT KDC > - Using UI, kerberize the existing cluster > - Using the UI, add the Oozie service > OOZIE_SERVER failed to start and the above noted exception was from the log that is exposed via the UI for the oozie start operation. > According to Robert Levas this property is in the kerberos descriptor it should be set. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)