ambari-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alejandro Fernandez" <afernan...@hortonworks.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 34115: RU: Should not complain about decommissioned components
Date Tue, 12 May 2015 17:11:22 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34115/#review83429
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Alejandro Fernandez


On May 12, 2015, 4:59 p.m., Dmitro Lisnichenko wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/34115/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 12, 2015, 4:59 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Alejandro Fernandez and Nate Cole.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-11073
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-11073
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Rolling Upgrades currently complains about decommissioned datanodes and/or node managers
during pre-requisites checks. We should be resilient to Decommision.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/checks/CheckDescription.java 083d3f9

>   ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/checks/ServicesDecommissionCheck.java
6ebfd1f 
>   ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/checks/ServicesDecommissionCheckTest.java
1c3056b 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34115/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manual checks on live cluster.
> Unit tests in progress
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dmitro Lisnichenko
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message