Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ambari-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ambari-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DEC610FA8 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 22:33:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82839 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2014 22:33:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ambari-dev-archive@ambari.apache.org Received: (qmail 82742 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2014 22:33:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ambari.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ambari.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ambari.apache.org Received: (qmail 82538 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2014 22:33:13 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 22:33:13 +0000 Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 22:33:13 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Hurley (JIRA)" To: dev@ambari.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (AMBARI-8724) Rolling Upgrade - Upgrade Pack to restart standby ResourceManager first, failover, and then upgrade the remaining RM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-8724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14249081#comment-14249081 ] Jonathan Hurley commented on AMBARI-8724: ----------------------------------------- +1 - I have comments b/c I'm confused and don't fully understand the system yet and want to make sure what I'm seeing isn't a boog. {noformat} - + {noformat} - Can this be hosts="active" maybe? It's a little confusing; makes it seem like you're saying "Run it on all masters" when I think we're saying "Run it only on the main master (ignoring others in standby". {noformat} // !!! revisit if needed if (hostsType.master != null && hostsType.secondary != null) { {noformat} - Should this be secondary? I would think that a secondary master (like Secondary NN) would not affect this task, but another standby master would {noformat} if (execwrappers.size() > 0) { results.addAll(execwrappers); {noformat} - Change to !isEmpty() to appease the anti-size() gods? > Rolling Upgrade - Upgrade Pack to restart standby ResourceManager first, failover, and then upgrade the remaining RM > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: AMBARI-8724 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-8724 > Project: Ambari > Issue Type: Technical task > Components: ambari-server > Affects Versions: 2.0.0 > Reporter: Alejandro Fernandez > Assignee: Nate Cole > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > Attachments: AMBARI-8724.patch > > > Runbook outlines that RM needs to first upgrade the standby, then failover to make the upgrade standby the active, and then upgrade the RM that is now the standby. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)