Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ambari-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ambari-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D36D3C84A for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 19:46:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39118 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2014 19:46:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ambari-dev-archive@ambari.apache.org Received: (qmail 39090 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2014 19:46:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ambari.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ambari.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ambari.apache.org Received: (qmail 39076 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2014 19:46:13 -0000 Received: from reviews-vm.apache.org (HELO reviews.apache.org) (140.211.11.40) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 19:46:13 +0000 Received: from reviews.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by reviews.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A0F21DFE22; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 19:46:16 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============8943517353417991031==" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Review Request 27913: Views: support validation From: "Alejandro Fernandez" To: "Alejandro Fernandez" , "Jonathan Hurley" Cc: "Ambari" , "Tom Beerbower" Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 19:46:16 -0000 Message-ID: <20141112194616.17177.46938@reviews.apache.org> X-ReviewBoard-URL: https://reviews.apache.org Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Sender: "Alejandro Fernandez" X-ReviewGroup: Ambari X-ReviewRequest-URL: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27913/ X-Sender: "Alejandro Fernandez" References: <20141112163823.17177.60670@reviews.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <20141112163823.17177.60670@reviews.apache.org> Reply-To: "Alejandro Fernandez" X-ReviewRequest-Repository: ambari --===============8943517353417991031== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27913/#review61047 ----------------------------------------------------------- Ship it! Nice, this should be useful for the Jobs View to validate that the URLs and ports are correctly formatted and reachable. FYI, https://mathiasbynens.be/demo/url-regex - Alejandro Fernandez On Nov. 12, 2014, 4:38 p.m., Tom Beerbower wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/27913/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 4:38 p.m.) > > > Review request for Ambari, Alejandro Fernandez and Jonathan Hurley. > > > Bugs: AMBARI-8295 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-8295 > > > Repository: ambari > > > Description > ------- > > Proposal: > The view framework SPI exposes a new Validator interface that could optionally be implemented by the view developer. The Validator interface allows the view developer to define the validation logic that gets applied when a new view instance is created or updated. The interface specifies a svalidate method that is passed a ViewInstanceDefinition. The given view instance is the instance that is being created or updated. The validator has full access to the instance definition as well as the owning view definition so it can check things like parameters and properties. If the validator successfully validates the given instance it simply returns. If the validation fails then the validator should throw an ValidationException with a message that describes the failure. > > {code} > public interface Validator { > /** > * Validate the given view instance definition. Return {@code null} to indicate that > * no validation was performed. > * > * @param definition the view instance definition > * @param mode the validation mode > * > * @return the instance validation result; may be {@code null} > */ > public ValidationResult validateInstance(ViewInstanceDefinition definition, ValidationContext mode); > > /** > * Validate a property of the given view instance definition. Return {@code null} to indicate that > * no validation was performed. > * > * @param property the property name > * @param definition the view instance definition > * @param mode the validation mode > * > * @return the instance validation result; may be {@code null} > */ > public ValidationResult validateProperty(String property, ViewInstanceDefinition definition, ValidationContext mode); > > /** > * The context in which a view instance validation check is performed. > */ > public enum ValidationContext { > PRE_CREATE, // validation prior to creation > PRE_UPDATE, // validation prior to update > EXISTING // validation of an existing view instance > } > } > {code} > > The context allows the framework a way to let the validator know at what point in the view instance lifecycle the validation is being performed. If a validation fails during instance create (PRE_CREATE), the view framework will rollback the instance creation and will fail with an appropriate response (see below). The same is true for instance update (PRE_UPDATE). The validator (if specified) will also be called during a GET of view instance resources (EXISTING) and be reported back as properties of the resource in the normal response. > > So, for example, a view instance may have a 'server' property. During instance creation (PRE_CREATE), the validator for the view might check the 'server' property for invalid characters and fail the create if found. After an instance is created and a request to get the instance resource is made (EXISTING), the validator might check to see if the server specified by the 'server' property is actually reachable and fail the verify if not. In this case the view instance resource is still reachable but the fact that the validation failed will show as a property in the instance resource (see below). > > The result of the validation for the view instance and each of its properties are returned from the validator to the view framework in the validation result classes ... > {code} > public interface ValidationResult { > > /** > * Determine whether or not the result is valid. > * > * @return true if the result is valid > */ > public boolean isValid(); > > /** > * Get the detail of the validation result. > * > * @return the validation result detail > */ > public String getDetail(); > > /** > * Successful validation result. > */ > public static final ValidationResult SUCCESS = new ValidationResult() { > @Override > public boolean isValid() { > return true; > } > > @Override > public String getDetail() { > return "OK"; > } > }; > } > {code} > > > If a POST or PUT for a view instance fails because of a validation check the results will look something like this (note in the example that the validation for one property passed while the other failed) ... > > {code} > { > "status": 400, > "message": "{"propertyResults": { > "cities": { > "valid": true, > "detail": "OK" > }, > "units": { > "valid": false, > "detail": "Units must be either metric or imperial." > } > }, "valid": false, "detail": "The instance has invalid properties."}" > } > {code} > > > When a view specifies a validator, the instance resource will include the properties 'validation_result' and 'property_validation_results' which will be reevaluated each time the resource is requested... > > {code} > { > "href" : "http://c6401.ambari.apache.org:8080/api/v1/views/WEATHER/versions/1.0.0/instances/EUROPE", > "ViewInstanceInfo" : { > "instance_name" : "EUROPE", > ... > "validation_result" : { > "valid" : true, > "detail" : "OK" > }, > "version" : "1.0.0", > "view_name" : "WEATHER", > ... > "properties" : { > "cities" : "London, UK;Paris;Munich", > "units" : "imperial" > }, > "property_validation_results" : { > "cities" : { > "valid" : true, > "detail" : "OK" > }, > "units" : { > "valid" : true, > "detail" : "OK" > } > } > }, > ... > {code} > > Note that in the examples above, the detail messages are provided by the view Validator implementation and are specific to the view (it can be any text that makes sense for that view). > > > Diffs > ----- > > ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/BaseProvider.java b4d582a > ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/ViewInstanceResourceProvider.java 3f62cc3 > ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/orm/entities/ViewEntity.java d42e1a0 > ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/orm/entities/ViewInstanceEntity.java efa2818 > ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/view/ViewRegistry.java a5d11bd > ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/view/configuration/ViewConfig.java 3a23ea7 > ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/view/validation/InstanceValidationResultImpl.java PRE-CREATION > ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/view/validation/ValidationResultImpl.java PRE-CREATION > ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/BaseProviderTest.java fc8acd0 > ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/orm/entities/ViewEntityTest.java 965cebb > ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/orm/entities/ViewInstanceEntityTest.java 08aea6e > ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/view/configuration/ViewConfigTest.java f6ec403 > ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/view/validation/InstanceValidationResultImplTest.java PRE-CREATION > ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/view/validation/ValidationResultImplTest.java PRE-CREATION > ambari-views/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/view/validation/ValidationResult.java PRE-CREATION > ambari-views/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/view/validation/Validator.java PRE-CREATION > ambari-views/src/main/resources/view.xsd b95e4ec > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27913/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Manual tests. > > New unit tests added. All existing tests pass ... > > Results : > > Tests run: 2244, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 14 > > > [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS > [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] Total time: 24:20 min > [INFO] Finished at: 2014-11-12T07:51:20-05:00 > [INFO] Final Memory: 41M/351M > [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Thanks, > > Tom Beerbower > > --===============8943517353417991031==--