ambari-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Hill <greg.h...@RACKSPACE.COM>
Subject Re: are there any public discussions about the direction of Ambari?
Date Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:53:54 GMT
The new permissions stuff does sound better, and thanks for the
clarification.  I look forward to seeing a more open process.  We have a
team here at Rackspace that will likely start being involved more over the
next few months, and it would be nice to be part of the process.


On 8/22/14 8:43 PM, "Yusaku Sako" <> wrote:

>I completely agree with you.
>The whole roadmap/design process needs to be much more transparent and
>open so that those involved in the project are on the same page.
>We have had designs posted on JIRAs for review/feedback/consensus, but
>unfortunately that seems to be the exception rather than the rule;
>this must be changed.  As Erin mentioned, there's a wiki for the
>Product Roadmap, but this is a bit too high level with no easy way to
>correlate which JIRAs correspond to which features.
>I will bring this up with the Ambari PMC to discuss ways to
>significantly improve this.
>Regarding the "roles" removal, this is being replaced by a much more
>flexible mechanism with permissions and privileges.
>Previously, there were very coarse-grained roles called "admin" and
>"user", with "admin" users having the right to read/write via the API
>(i.e., POST/PUT/DELETE/GET), versus "user" users who can only make
>read-only API calls (i.e., GET).
>We had to get more granular than that, because users (and groups)
>exist independent of any cluster now that Ambari Views are being
>The new mechanism allows granting permissions (that are customizable)
>to users (and groups) on clusters and Ambari Views (and other
>resources that may be introduced in the future).
>When upgrading to the upcoming Ambari 1.7.0, the upgrade script will
>automatically perform this conversion, so to the end user, this all
>happens behind the scenes so that existing admins and users retain the
>same access rights to the cluster.
>I hope this clears things up, and sorry about the surprise.
>On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Erin Boyd <> wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>> I think this would be very helpful to all those whom are involved in
>>the Ambari project.
>> There is a current roadmap published on the wiki that I would found
>> But as far as roles, I haven't found anything on the wiki.
>> Erin
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Greg Hill" <greg.hill@RACKSPACE.COM>
>> To:
>> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 10:25:18 AM
>> Subject: are there any public discussions about the direction of Ambari?
>> I see a lot of work going on.  I was surprised to see the 'roles' bit
>>was removed (is that being replaced with something else to handle access
>>control?).  It seems like a lot of the devs are on the same page about
>>the direction of the project, yet I see no evidence of any public
>>discussion about it.  There's nothing on the mailing lists, the IRC
>>channel is always quiet.  Is all of this just decided at internal
>>meetings at Hortonworks or is there some other place I could be
>>checking?  Any chance of opening up the process so us outsiders can see
>>what's coming before it just lands on us?
>> Greg
>NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
>which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>and delete it from your system. Thank You.

View raw message