Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ambari-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ambari-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9731C105AD for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41134 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2014 11:45:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ambari-dev-archive@ambari.apache.org Received: (qmail 40811 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2014 11:45:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ambari.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ambari.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ambari.apache.org Received: (qmail 40655 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2014 11:45:15 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:45:15 +0000 Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:45:15 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ximo Guanter (JIRA)" To: dev@ambari.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (AMBARI-4930) Ambari initialization problems after upgrade to 1.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-4930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13946416#comment-13946416 ] Ximo Guanter commented on AMBARI-4930: -------------------------------------- It seems like the heavy tales are the task related tables: {code} ambarirca=# SELECT relname, relfilenode, relpages FROM pg_class where relpages>1000; -- aprox 8 MB relname | relfilenode | relpages ------------------+-------------+---------- task_pkey | 18329 | 22118 -- 173 MB taskattempt_pkey | 18342 | 22976 -- 179 MB taskattempt | 18336 | 76022 -- 594 MB task | 18323 | 61783 -- 482 MB (4 rows) {code} > Ambari initialization problems after upgrade to 1.4.1 > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: AMBARI-4930 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-4930 > Project: Ambari > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 1.4.1 > Reporter: Ximo Guanter > > Starting the Ambari Server sometime fails with the following error > {code} > 04:44:56,972 INFO [main] Configuration:511 - Web App DIR test /usr/lib/ambari-server/web > 04:44:56,975 INFO [main] CertificateManager:70 - Initialization of root certificate > 04:44:56,975 INFO [main] CertificateManager:72 - Certificate exists:true > 04:44:57,003 INFO [main] AmbariServer:338 - ********* Initializing Clusters ********** > 04:44:57,285 WARN [Thread-2] HeartbeatMonitor:123 - Heartbeat lost from host andromeda-compute02.hi.inet > 04:44:57,295 WARN [Thread-2] HeartbeatMonitor:123 - Heartbeat lost from host andromeda-compute03.hi.inet > 04:44:57,296 WARN [Thread-2] HeartbeatMonitor:123 - Heartbeat lost from host andromeda-compute06.hi.inet > 04:44:57,296 WARN [Thread-2] HeartbeatMonitor:123 - Heartbeat lost from host andromeda-compute04.hi.inet > 04:44:57,297 WARN [Thread-2] HeartbeatMonitor:123 - Heartbeat lost from host andromeda-data99.hi.inet > 04:44:57,318 ERROR [main] AmbariServer:461 - Failed to run the Ambari Server > Local Exception Stack: > Exception [EclipseLink-2004] (Eclipse Persistence Services - 2.4.0.v20120608-r11652): org.eclipse.persistence.exceptions.ConcurrencyException > Exception Description: A signal was attempted before wait() on ConcurrencyManager. This normally means that an attempt was made to > commit or rollback a transaction before it was started, or to rollback a transaction twice. > at org.eclipse.persistence.exceptions.ConcurrencyException.signalAttemptedBeforeWait(ConcurrencyException.java:84) > at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.helper.ConcurrencyManager.releaseReadLock(ConcurrencyManager.java:489) > at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.identitymaps.CacheKey.releaseReadLock(CacheKey.java:392) > at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.UnitOfWorkImpl.cloneAndRegisterObject(UnitOfWorkImpl.java:1022) > at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.UnitOfWorkImpl.cloneAndRegisterObject(UnitOfWorkImpl.java:933) > at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.UnitOfWorkIdentityMapAccessor.getAndCloneCacheKeyFromParent(UnitOfWorkIdentityMapAccessor.java:193) > at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.UnitOfWorkIdentityMapAccessor.getFromIdentityMap(UnitOfWorkIdentityMapAccessor.java:121) > at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.UnitOfWorkImpl.registerExistingObject(UnitOfWorkImpl.java:3906) > at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.UnitOfWorkImpl.registerExistingObject(UnitOfWorkImpl.java:3861) > at org.eclipse.persistence.mappings.CollectionMapping.buildElementUnitOfWorkClone(CollectionMapping.java:296) > at org.eclipse.persistence.mappings.CollectionMapping.buildElementClone(CollectionMapping.java:309) > at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.queries.ContainerPolicy.addNextValueFromIteratorInto(ContainerPolicy.java:214) > at org.eclipse.persistence.mappings.CollectionMapping.buildCloneForPartObject(CollectionMapping.java:222) > at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.indirection.UnitOfWorkQueryValueHolder.buildCloneFor(UnitOfWorkQueryValueHolder.java:56) > at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.indirection.UnitOfWorkValueHolder.instantiateImpl(UnitOfWorkValueHolder.java:161) > at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.indirection.UnitOfWorkValueHolder.instantiate(UnitOfWorkValueHolder.java:222) > at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.indirection.DatabaseValueHolder.getValue(DatabaseValueHolder.java:88) > at org.eclipse.persistence.indirection.IndirectList.buildDelegate(IndirectList.java:244) > at org.eclipse.persistence.indirection.IndirectList.getDelegate(IndirectList.java:415) > at org.eclipse.persistence.indirection.IndirectList.isEmpty(IndirectList.java:490) > at org.apache.ambari.server.state.ServiceImpl.(ServiceImpl.java:125) > at org.apache.ambari.server.state.ServiceImpl$$EnhancerByGuice$$807a405e.() > at org.apache.ambari.server.state.ServiceImpl$$EnhancerByGuice$$807a405e$$FastClassByGuice$$1c1221ad.newInstance() > at com.google.inject.internal.cglib.reflect.$FastConstructor.newInstance(FastConstructor.java:40) > at com.google.inject.internal.ProxyFactory$ProxyConstructor.newInstance(ProxyFactory.java:260) > at com.google.inject.internal.ConstructorInjector.construct(ConstructorInjector.java:85) > at com.google.inject.internal.ConstructorBindingImpl$Factory.get(ConstructorBindingImpl.java:254) > at com.google.inject.internal.InjectorImpl$4$1.call(InjectorImpl.java:978) > at com.google.inject.internal.InjectorImpl.callInContext(InjectorImpl.java:1024) > at com.google.inject.internal.InjectorImpl$4.get(InjectorImpl.java:974) > at com.google.inject.assistedinject.FactoryProvider2.invoke(FactoryProvider2.java:632) > at $Proxy12.createExisting(Unknown Source) > at org.apache.ambari.server.state.cluster.ClusterImpl.loadServices(ClusterImpl.java:218) > at org.apache.ambari.server.state.cluster.ClusterImpl.debugDump(ClusterImpl.java:808) > at org.apache.ambari.server.state.cluster.ClustersImpl.debugDump(ClustersImpl.java:566) > at org.apache.ambari.server.controller.AmbariServer.run(AmbariServer.java:341) > at org.apache.ambari.server.controller.AmbariServer.main(AmbariServer.java:458) > {code} > The issue seems to be related with the amount of data in the {{ambarirca}} database: it reproduces 80-90% of the time we try to start the ambari-server on an environment in which that DB is 1GB+ and it basically never reproduces on environments with a small DB. > Running the {{VACUUM FULL}} command does not help minimize the problem. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)