Mailing-List: contact ambari-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ambari-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of denizdemir@me.com designates
 17.172.204.240 as permitted sender)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: Current State of Trunk
From: Deniz Demir <denizdemir@me.com>
In-reply-to: <D76F8185-B18C-4FEE-B51E-B36ED324A396@hortonworks.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:00:36 -0700
Message-id: <F4A92384-9C4A-44F2-A3F0-F8028D57DB02@me.com>
References: <932C04B3-82F9-46AF-92CF-4373CDD0603D@me.com>
 <CAOV3o_Dbfi5DmcsLUSCCM3tBBaCh2K5cM=E_J6qYykynhihchQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <E0038AB9-7472-4A91-8DAF-E2B5C035C334@me.com>
 <7CB1F0A3-37E2-4E3E-988D-038ECB8C7266@me.com>
 <D76F8185-B18C-4FEE-B51E-B36ED324A396@hortonworks.com>
To: ambari-dev@incubator.apache.org

Hi Vikram,

Thank you very much for your response. I am looking forward to its release. Is there any design documents for Ambari-186? 

By the way, is the code in trunk usable right now? I mean, does it work?

Best,
Deniz


On Jun 7, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Vikram Dixit wrote:

> Hi Deniz,
> 
> Your observation is right. Ambari-186 is completely different from trunk. Hopefully it will replace it.
> 
> Regardless, I am of the opinion that this tree should be ready for consumption in 2-3 weeks. We are currently stabilizing this code base.
> 
> Thank you for your interest.
> 
> Regards
> Vikram.
> 
> On Jun 7, 2012, at 5:47 PM, Deniz Demir wrote:
> 
>> I am still hoping a response to the following questions. I am also curious for the time table for the first release.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Deniz
>> 
>> 
>> On Jun 6, 2012, at 10:59 PM, Deniz Demir wrote:
>> 
>>> It looks like Ambari-186 is completely different from what is in the trunk. Do you mean it will replace what is currently in trunk? Or does it work with or on top of trunk code? 
>>> 
>>> I mean, what is the relationship between trunk and ambari-186 branch?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Deniz
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jun 6, 2012, at 10:54 PM, Vitthal Suhas Gogate wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Ambari-186 should be in a working state soon. Its actively developed and
>>>> tested at Hortonworks.  Once it is working, I plan to propose merging it
>>>> with trunk resolving some architectural differences before making the first
>>>> Ambari release.
>>>> 
>>>> --Suhas
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Deniz Demir <denizdemir@me.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am trying to understand Ambari and its code base, and I think I am a
>>>>> little confused. "trunk" is 5 months old, and all activity seems to be in
>>>>> branch-186, under hmc. I am wondering whether Ambari design got changed
>>>>> compared with what is described in the "High-level Design" section of the
>>>>> home page.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Deniz
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>