allura-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dave Brondsema" <>
Subject [allura:tickets] #7837 Use repo directly instead of DiffInfoDoc
Date Thu, 05 Mar 2015 16:22:05 GMT
After going through this for DiffInfoDoc, any new thoughts about how much work for other repo
models?  Or probably each is unique in how it is used, effort to make changes, architecture,
performance, etc.


** [tickets:#7837] Use repo directly instead of DiffInfoDoc**

**Status:** review
**Milestone:** unreleased
**Labels:** 42cc sf-8 sf-current indexless 
**Created:** Fri Feb 20, 2015 10:40 PM UTC by Dave Brondsema
**Last Updated:** Thu Mar 05, 2015 10:42 AM UTC
**Owner:** Igor Bondarenko

See [#7828] for analysis of where DiffInfoDoc is used.  Goal is to remove it altogether, using
SCM data directly.  Then also remove the building of DiffInfoDoc records during repo refresh.
 (If there are really slow computations we could keep using DiffInfoDoc for a cache of those


Sent from because is subscribed to

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at
 Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
  • Unnamed multipart/related (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message