From dev-return-9530-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@airflow.apache.org Thu Oct 3 17:18:09 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id E4FFD18065B for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 19:18:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 1840 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2019 17:18:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airflow.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@airflow.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@airflow.apache.org Received: (qmail 1828 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2019 17:18:07 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO mailrelay1-lw-us.apache.org) (10.10.3.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 17:18:07 +0000 Received: from [10.210.174.248] (unknown [85.255.234.33]) by mailrelay1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 36A156222; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 17:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 18:18:05 +0100 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----4Y6CAVJOAT7U67D7Z8KVSBNHE3Y9IW" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: AIP-21 - grouping google operators To: dev@airflow.apache.org,Leah Cole From: Ash Berlin-Taylor Message-ID: <06ACB67B-B145-46CF-A392-21EFC3C0A4CC@apache.org> ------4Y6CAVJOAT7U67D7Z8KVSBNHE3Y9IW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 for something under airflow=2Egoogle - though I'm now wondering if airfl= ow=2Eprovider=2Egoogle is a "better" name, as airflow=2Egoogle is a little = bit non-descript=2E I'm not personally familiar with the detail of what product suite each pro= duct in Google is under, and I don't think our users should have to know/ch= oose between cloud or gsuite=2E But I'm not against these subsubpackages either On 3 October 2019 18:02:34 BST, Leah Cole wrote: >I think gdrive should be a part of gsuite, as drive is a part of gsuite >technically > >On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 9:01 AM Jarek Potiuk >wrote: > >> As part of AIP-21 we are moving the operators to core=2E >> >> We have been discussing during the last few days how we should group >the >> operators from Google (we included Google Composer team) and we came >to the >> conclusion that we need to group the operators in sub-modules=2E >> >> We originally moved most of the operators to "gcp" but since then we >have >> more operators from Google that do not fit "gcp" (marketing >> platform, gsuite, and gdrive operators)=2E >> >> airflow/google >> /cloud - [operators, hooks, examples] >> /marketing_platform - [operators, hooks, examples] >> /gdrive - [operators, hooks, examples] >> /gsuite - [operators, hooks, examples] >> >> This is much more reasonable and logical (and makes the operators >easy to >> find)=2E It is still following AIP-21 (we have not defined the exact >naming >> for each provider)=2E >> >> This is a change that comes in 2=2E0=2E0 we can still change it without >hassle >> so we thought it's a good idea to do it now=2E Does anyone have >anything >> against it ? If not we will soon move the operators there=2E >> >> J=2E >> -- >> >> Jarek Potiuk >> Polidea | Principal Software Engineer >> >> M: +48 660 796 129 <+48%20660%20796%20129> <+48660796129 >> <+48%20660%20796%20129>> >> [image: Polidea] >> > > >--=20 > >Leah Cole | Developer Programs Engineer | coleleah@google=2Ecom | (925) >257-2112 ------4Y6CAVJOAT7U67D7Z8KVSBNHE3Y9IW--