airflow-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <aizha...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Donating Airflow k8s Operator
Date Tue, 17 Sep 2019 17:34:10 GMT
Thanks everyone for participating in the discussion! I see there is a
consensus among the community on this regard, therefore we will move
forward with the process.

Next step is to get IP clearance as described here [1]. This step is done
by the receiving PMC, and @Jakob Homan <jghoman@gmail.com> has agreed to
help. Thank you!

I am closing this thread now, and Jakob will start a new one when it is
time to vote.

Thanks everyone,
Aizhamal

[1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:41 PM Kamil Breguła <kamil.bregula@polidea.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 8:40 PM Jarek Potiuk <Jarek.Potiuk@polidea.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for aieflow-on-k8s-operator. Good enough :)
> >
> > J.
> >
> > pt., 13 wrz 2019, 19:19 użytkownik Tao Feng <fengtao04@gmail.com>
> napisał:
> >
> > > +1 on `airflow-on-k8s-operator` as well
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:07 AM Ry Walker <ry@rywalker.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 from me for sure. Thanks for pushing this through Aizhamal.
> > > >
> > > > GCP just named their flink operator (
> > > > https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/flink-on-k8s-operator
> > > > ) *flink-on-k8s-operator.*
> > > >
> > > > So  for name, I prefer either *k8s-operator-for-airflow* or
> > > > *airflow-on-k8s-operator*. I sort of like the latter better because
> > > > *airflow* is the first word rather than the last.
> > > >
> > > > -Ry
> > > >
> > > > czw., 12 wrz 2019, 16:17 użytkownik Jarek Potiuk < Jarek. Potiuk@
> > > > polidea. com ( Jarek.Potiuk@polidea.com ) > napisał:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Fantastic! Strong +1 from me.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > To alleviate some of the concerns - we @Polidea are just starting
a
> > > > > project for big and serious customer where we will most likely use
> and
> > > > > extend Kubernetes Operator.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > We have 3 people that could become contributors and commiters day
> one,
> > > so
> > > > > we can already help building community for it. Looking forward to
> > > > > following the Apache way in this case !
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > J.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:23 AM Tao Feng < fengtao04@ gmail. com
(
> > > > > fengtao04@gmail.com ) > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> +1 as well. One question: does the original author still actively
> > > > maintain
> > > > >> or would like to continue maintaining the code base after the
> repo is
> > > > >> moved
> > > > >>
> > > > >> to Airflow?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:10 PM Sumit Maheshwari < sumeet.
manit@
> > > > gmail. com
> > > > >> ( sumeet.manit@gmail.com )
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Strong +1
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:29 AM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <
> aizhamal@
> > > > apache.
> > > > >>> org ( aizhamal@apache.org ) >
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Hello Airflow community,
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Over the last year, an engineer at Google developed,
and open
> > > sourced
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> a
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Kubernetes operator to run Airflow[1]. Anyone can use
it to
> deploy
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Airflow
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> on their k8s cluster freely.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> There have been discussions among community members that
it
> would be
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> great
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> to donate the operator to Apache to be part of Airflow.
That
> way it
> > > is
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> easy
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> to accept contributions from the community, improve and
> maintain it
> > > > >>>> collectively and transparently, along with the Airflow-k8s
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> integration.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> This idea has been discussed at Google, and we have obtained
all
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> necessary
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> approvals to donate the operator.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> This discussion is to gather opinions from the community
> whether you
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> all
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> think that it is a good idea. I personally think that
this
> would be
> > > a
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> great
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> addition to Airflow.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Please express your thoughts or concerns if you have
any.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> The discussion will run for 72 hours, and if there is
consensus
> on
> > > > >>>> accepting the donation, we will move the code under the
Apache
> > > > >>>> organization, to be owned by the Airflow community. If
> consensus is
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> not
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> evident, we can have a vote after this discussion.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Aizhamal
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sent via Superhuman ( https://sprh.mn/?vip=ry@rywalker.com )
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 11:19 AM, Jarek Potiuk <
> > > Jarek.Potiuk@polidea.com
> > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The name is indeed misleading. My proposal would be
> > > > > k8s-operator-for-airflow - this might make it unambiguous .
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > czw., 12 wrz 2019, 16:17 użytkownik Jarek Potiuk < Jarek. Potiuk@
> > > > polidea.
> > > > > com ( Jarek.Potiuk@polidea.com ) > napisał:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Fantastic! Strong +1 from me.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> To alleviate some of the concerns - we @Polidea are just starting
> a
> > > > >> project for big and serious customer where we will most likely
> use and
> > > > >> extend Kubernetes Operator.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> We have 3 people that could become contributors and commiters
day
> one,
> > > > so
> > > > >> we can already help building community for it. Looking forward
to
> > > > >> following the Apache way in this case !
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> J.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:23 AM Tao Feng < fengtao04@ gmail.
com
> (
> > > > >> fengtao04@gmail.com ) > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> +1 as well. One question: does the original author still
actively
> > > > maintain
> > > > >>> or would like to continue maintaining the code base after
the
> repo is
> > > > >>> moved
> > > > >>> to Airflow?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:10 PM Sumit Maheshwari < sumeet.
> manit@
> > > > gmail. com
> > > > >>> ( sumeet.manit@gmail.com )
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Strong +1
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:29 AM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy
<
> aizhamal@
> > > > apache.
> > > > >>>> org ( aizhamal@apache.org ) >
> > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Hello Airflow community,
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Over the last year, an engineer at Google developed,
and open
> > > sourced
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> a
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Kubernetes operator to run Airflow[1]. Anyone can
use it to
> deploy
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Airflow
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> on their k8s cluster freely.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> There have been discussions among community members
that it
> would
> > > be
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> great
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> to donate the operator to Apache to be part of Airflow.
That
> way it
> > > > is
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> easy
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> to accept contributions from the community, improve
and
> maintain it
> > > > >>>>> collectively and transparently, along with the Airflow-k8s
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> integration.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> This idea has been discussed at Google, and we have
obtained
> all
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> necessary
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> approvals to donate the operator.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> This discussion is to gather opinions from the community
> whether
> > > you
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> all
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> think that it is a good idea. I personally think
that this
> would
> > > be a
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> great
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> addition to Airflow.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Please express your thoughts or concerns if you have
any.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> The discussion will run for 72 hours, and if there
is
> consensus on
> > > > >>>>> accepting the donation, we will move the code under
the Apache
> > > > >>>>> organization, to be owned by the Airflow community.
If
> consensus is
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> not
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> evident, we can have a vote after this discussion.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>>> Aizhamal
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> [1] https:/ / github. com/ GoogleCloudPlatform/
> airflow-operator (
> > > > >>>>> https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/airflow-operator
)
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message