airflow-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Driesprong, Fokko" <fo...@driesprong.frl>
Subject Re: RFC - GCP Operator Development Guide
Date Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:19:34 GMT
+1 from my side, looking good.

Op vr 22 feb. 2019 om 15:54 schreef Kaxil Naik <kaxilnaik@gmail.com>:

> +1 from me as well.
>
> Either confluence of this is fine with me.
>
> Regards,
> Kaxil
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:48 AM Tao Feng <fengtao04@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 from my side. Thanks Feng.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 8:23 PM Feng Lu <fenglu@google.com.invalid>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> 20-ish people from the community have reviewed this doc. I believe we
> have
> >> addressed all comments and the doc is good to go.
> >> Trying to figure out the right place to publish this GCP operator style
> >> guide doc, how about the Apache Airflow public doc site
> >> <https://airflow.apache.org/>? Thinking of:  Developer's Guide > GCP
> >> Operator Style Guide.
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> Feng
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 11:56 PM Feng Lu <fenglu@google.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > A number of us worked on this GCP operator development style guide and
> >> > best practice doc, would like to share with everyone and get your
> >> feedback.
> >> >
> >> > GCP Service Airflow Integration Guide
> >> > <
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_rTdJSLCt0eyrAylmmgYc3yZr-_h51fVlnvMmWqhCkY/edit?ts=5bb72dfd#heading=h.3sxddzjr5f6q
> >> >
> >> > [*DRAFT*]
> >> >
> >> > Airflow committers, once this doc is finalized, any suggestion on the
> >> best
> >> > place to host it?
> >> > Thank you.
> >> >
> >> > Feng
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
> --
> *Kaxil Naik*
> *Big Data Consultant *@ *Data Reply UK*
> *Certified *Google Cloud Data Engineer | *Certified* Apache Spark & Neo4j
> Developer
> *LinkedIn*: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kaxil
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message