From dev-return-7211-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@airflow.incubator.apache.org Tue Dec 18 20:56:24 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 38E6C180675 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 20:56:24 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 79051 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2018 19:56:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airflow.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 79034 invoked by uid 99); 18 Dec 2018 19:56:22 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 19:56:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E4392C0791 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 19:56:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.798 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.798 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id va7UVCJmm76W for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 19:56:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it1-f180.google.com (mail-it1-f180.google.com [209.85.166.180]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id A1E5C60E2A for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 19:56:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it1-f180.google.com with SMTP id z7so6087174iti.0 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:56:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5XZiWwDIOOcXA5RCGLy75rkhMv8+2EFzFZi0ubuhEfo=; b=CR8IVJbPOKPKYJFhaFNmpGuKEPGeqrht9GzTOHx9Ee9oSKqHrBEErx2dsQwTSIGjSM GwM8czUS6CPP1t7qmpX1eKj6nsTys9ztBRcQ5kuxrkXrLnFwi40t9hP1CFi61FtiUibs r256xTC//uW0U7F0ThC4UA+Sffd7Ga8o1VnNCfyL5BQeMOV3ZASxAtc3ZqCodwj0R56B 6Qthj4cCodZWNVhwFvMobr2ePJeCPG6oNYB6ZeKbuuw3ZXsU+FNpo40nNA0pjZ1VOwZm sH7neMZODa8UsXIFgyBrHtExqLhGfpTMF0D6qc3X1h9fT5CVhWI7srSthypgoG1lkD02 hEYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5XZiWwDIOOcXA5RCGLy75rkhMv8+2EFzFZi0ubuhEfo=; b=k5DhjQoJE0+QyF+gx0iHLmzZMOK10M2hYnxQTYgvFFiw8EEcUfTZu7JPI/pXIeMD+Q ToJ/9ocUMGDK+eZZNIRW/L3RDXuPh+O1zoxzSeuWoUR0kXwsKDtmqhzrTBZmy3efO1f7 M0SwOW2oOw3edi8pqESrwKLpz12bOsmpxl0FvSHmQH1xtYOT2KAOK0JZ6TpaArUeOrAx 6CVtv+d2ILc2s0jbn0hhRCEGfCUb2jf3K8+jeQCjxjKUVpBZrvVDXEIm1eap+UQINidZ 6Ykm2iHb0Ayd11tvVhS8hrWspB1TDSz8r2v03MSt1w5DEdqmMgo13lxUmVxEIgkM/Dbw TjAw== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbZw5Q7c5/0CTSrsG/gVEPT9YSrsLTQKmi86LAH6ny1rp8OLg4N TsvHoqF8QkdH1ih9DfF/X8mgai3OQlLiA51t7kk/5ABe X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/Uw6FOniEcCVdsgCWZpInKZUWyH+H1elliS3+fzER1R7y9SQDt2irTYKxLXO1O5z2LmMKb9QSs7bEnkNhnlLSk= X-Received: by 2002:a24:cb07:: with SMTP id u7mr4061938itg.118.1545162972805; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:56:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Daniel Imberman Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:56:01 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: UI not working on Master To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001d4170057d514a8b" --0000000000001d4170057d514a8b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello all, I've been testing the K8sExecutor and I notice that when I open the UI, I'm unable to see any of the DAGs even though they are in the aiflow/dags folder. I'm also still able to launch DAGs via the API. I have not tested this on any of the other executors yet. Is this a known issue? Also raises the question on whether we can set up some form of UI testing since I don't think the current unit/integration tests would catch this kind of error. Thank you --0000000000001d4170057d514a8b--