Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airflow.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <FC524EB9-2C6B-42DF-A9E6-265332987395@gmail.com>
References: <CABYbY7c5E6DTKjJ+eLRWmAY3fauUiGB6o4jLpzZEROb0QNT_rg@mail.gmail.com>
 <8924E987-E5E5-4AD6-A3E3-CC281B696202@gmail.com> <CABYbY7f3ufgGHe+3eOJafoh4rV7hBJ40yWgZ_mfMLEi_9n4fig@mail.gmail.com>
 <4245CD01-6102-4CEA-BC45-C5D0583871E6@gmail.com> <CABYbY7eGg4QVCfJa6qJ0-vJsAwBVhZLVb8dbRowO8oZ7c1HDKQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <FC524EB9-2C6B-42DF-A9E6-265332987395@gmail.com>
From: Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 14:19:55 -0800
Message-ID: <CABYbY7c-GVkiB=usV7jAL-ptf-EBY2L=ds73E97n7a4X1OLDRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Release question
To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113e2b247e3199056068663e"
archived-at: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 22:20:02 -0000

--001a113e2b247e3199056068663e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

le sigh

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com> wrote:

> Joy was quicker than me.
>
> Please make sure to remove =E2=80=9Cincubating=E2=80=9D from the version.=
 Just make sure
> the file name on Apache dist has it in its name.
>
> Bolke
>
> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>
> > Op 15 dec. 2017 om 22:32 heeft Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org>
> het volgende geschreven:
> >
> > No worries. It gives me a chance to fix this:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2884
> >
> > Could you have a quick look?
> >
> >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Better document this. Pffff sorry dude.
> >>
> >> B.
> >>
> >> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
> >>
> >>> Op 15 dec. 2017 om 22:17 heeft Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org=
>
> >> het volgende geschreven:
> >>>
> >>> The artifact version has an rc6 in it. I suppose we need to re-vote.
> >> Sigh.
> >>>
> >>>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Ehmmmm
> >>>>
> >>>> Renaming the file is fine, but the artifacts inside should stay the
> >> same.
> >>>> You cannot change what we voted on. So basically if the SHA/MD5
> changes
> >> we
> >>>> need to vote :-(.
> >>>>
> >>>> Tbh I did not look at the artifact description (version.py primarily=
,
> it
> >>>> should have read 1.9.0).
> >>>>
> >>>> Have a look at the mailing list history and how Max did it last time=
,
> >>>> because it changed a little bit, so I might be off a little.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers
> >>>> Bolke
> >>>>
> >>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
> >>>>
> >>>>> Op 15 dec. 2017 om 21:43 heeft Chris Riccomini <
> criccomini@apache.org>
> >>>> het volgende geschreven:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hey all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For 1.9.0, RC6 has passed the vote. Does anyone recall what the
> >> protocol
> >>>> is
> >>>>> for releasing it? I believe I need to re-build the artifacts to
> remove
> >>>> the
> >>>>> 'rc6' from the release. IIRC, we don't need to re-vote for this, do
> we?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>> Chris
> >>>>
> >>
>

--001a113e2b247e3199056068663e--