Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF62E200D34 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 23:05:57 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id E94A6160BFB; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 22:05:57 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 43F27160BDE for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 23:05:56 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 98580 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2017 22:05:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airflow.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 98568 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2017 22:05:54 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Nov 2017 22:05:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 092BF1805BE for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 22:05:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nTUX8bPaVOHW for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 22:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 837025FB40 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 22:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id t139so4211339wmt.1 for ; Fri, 03 Nov 2017 15:05:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=8sVxmXuTvM0TiDPFIMzCeqWaPYj9XDEPz28kJRu7ok8=; b=Q3yjKIDTpp+0ArnoLrTvNnDR4EXWwofe8kF4tMEg4UsDNhTX7Qy9OzBx7qaVcUMqMZ fzgcOqWUexqBnVnrD6+HcBGqEzweneNFGHlMkywPyRcuBRDhGjzCx2eaVc5AcANb0CBD if6obDpzeUwOr35C0fqeIx/cFTfGc5OeJPTof/IuZbgDobbQocCHRAQ7oCBt/kPihKzZ MmKJtGpe4rfzJ7rrgga5pDxLXiPkuPBL+5CnmkOIdNAJXXm9MJqDrFKSh+tZF1qb46Lu H+sapntWY9vzCfkW0kVxDkQGXEK5odB7tzn9Ub0cRg+CyGvwiu0cPw8p/QrtcSNPUWHM 7r4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=8sVxmXuTvM0TiDPFIMzCeqWaPYj9XDEPz28kJRu7ok8=; b=Ac89Ezz0axPmarMTfFXKJMAp7iMKWTEFk2gCbjXEAPL1G7nn1gluS7/sT2pcrpiym2 OLAX2PmwdyATEO+DM//PNAKz9ZGFLZTciGonyzGUCGQVjvarY+nuoFYiH7RBQEkmZ65P G2DCrpck4BvTbDqd2Jm/JlMWGxm0mxz5gvSbJuPoq2y94vAroEjIuR/t6Of0EBBKKckX JTShhXVbSEbvgUPSZ55Uub00sMhPy6Vz85AB8Y5kN1dSsUjnlrjzfJXQwzt4bbTiWK+4 TNwzRTqkMiNIrpjwTRMiItWaK6PAiNW1WSqd9M7WSKZfIG2JGo/H2dQYICvUVoEoS8hp 5Wuw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaWFoj+DOOxNf2+eziYyGbs+W3elSgYJKBYTGpb2dcuDbVQRkfoZ Hjc5OUnGAY4Eppz7uc2Ix+XGeXEpPK5U X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+QBZU1TardEop/IMOGBxCYHD0ThSdDSPPrj+/JIUdPvi6ghiLnV0IQ48yectlUvRsS16nJC0A== X-Received: by 10.80.187.44 with SMTP id y41mr10530444ede.154.1509746747520; Fri, 03 Nov 2017 15:05:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from macbook-pro.localdomain (f248061.upc-f.chello.nl. [80.56.248.61]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h56sm9198312ede.15.2017.11.03.15.05.46 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Nov 2017 15:05:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Bolke de Bruin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.1 \(3445.4.7\)) Subject: Re: Airflow 1.9.0 status Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 23:05:45 +0100 References: <5ACE8290-8B85-4CAD-9D4F-35C9C2690A91@gmail.com> <8913FD5DBE68DC4C83AE83264F30217D7E3D13B0@IRSMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com> To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.4.7) archived-at: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 22:05:58 -0000 If you make that v1-9-test into a tar we will test with you :-). > On 3 Nov 2017, at 22:59, Chris Riccomini = wrote: >=20 > Lol, so sorry. It's going to slip to Monday. Today got busy, and we = just > deployed latest v1-9-test to prd. Wanted to let it run over the = weekend. >=20 > Sorry for the delay. Monday (or weekend, if I'm motivated). >=20 > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Bolke de Bruin = wrote: >=20 >> Will we get it before the weekend? Oh the suspense ;-) >>=20 >> Sent from my iPhone >>=20 >>> On 2 Nov 2017, at 17:17, Chris Riccomini = wrote: >>>=20 >>> @mC, yes it will. >>>=20 >>> @Bolke, awesome! Will cut an RC today/tomorrow. :) Very exciting. >>>=20 >>> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Cieplucha, Michal < >>> michal.cieplucha@intel.com> wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Hello, >>>>=20 >>>> Will this: >>>> [AIRFLOW-1641] Handle executor events in the scheduler >>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/commit/ >>>> 2abead7049806482047e29d123a109b444c00355 >>>>=20 >>>> be included in 1.9? >>>>=20 >>>> mC >>>>=20 >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Bolke de Bruin [mailto:bdbruin@gmail.com] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 11:42 PM >>>> To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org >>>> Subject: Re: Airflow 1.9.0 status >>>>=20 >>>> I think we are ready for RC. >>>>=20 >>>> Bolke >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>> On 31 Oct 2017, at 21:30, Chris Riccomini >> wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>> Great, sounds like this is the last remaining JIRA, then? >>>>>=20 >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1764 >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Bolke de Bruin = >>>> wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>> Already fixed. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On 31 Oct 2017, at 18:49, Andy Hadjigeorgiou = >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Is this bug issue on DAG scheduling >>>>>>> something = that >>>>>> needs >>>>>>> resolution before the RC? >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Chris Riccomini >>>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Both blockers have been merged. Are we ready for an RC? >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Bolke de Bruin >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1764 is design/integration mistake (maybe worth a = CVE). >>>>>>>>> But >>>>>> 1765 >>>>>>>>> is not a vulnerability, although *maybe* unexpected behaviour. >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> Bolke. >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On 30 Oct 2017, at 19:51, Chris Riccomini = >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> I marked them as blocker. Still would like to understand how >>>>>>>>>> important >>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>> is, though. The API is experimental, so I could see an = argument >>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>>>> not being blocker provided the vulnerability is limited to >>>>>> experimental >>>>>>>>>> areas. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Ash Berlin-Taylor < >>>>>>>> ash@firemirror.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> I think we need to add >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1764 >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1765 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> to that list as critical security fixes. I'll tackled 1765 >>>>>>>>>>> tomorrow >>>>>>>> (UK >>>>>>>>>>> time) if no one gets round to it before then. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> -ash >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>> On 30 Oct 2017, at 17:58, Chris Riccomini >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all, >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>> Current blockers for 1.9.0: >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1711 >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1018 >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>> Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Chris Riccomini < >>>>>>>>> criccomini@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all, >>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Talked with @Bolke on Gitter. Here are the currently = blocking >>>>>> issues >>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0: >>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1744 |Bug ||Blocker ||Open >>>>>> |task.retries >>>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>>>>> be False >>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1731 |Bug ||Blocker ||Open = |Import >>>>>>>> custom >>>>>>>>>>>>> config on PYTHONPATH >>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1641 |Bug ||Blocker ||In = Progress|Task >>>> gets >>>>>>>>> stuck >>>>>>>>>>>>> in queued state >>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>> PRs are out for them. After these three are merged, I'm >>>>>>>>>>>>> planning to >>>>>>>>> cut >>>>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>>>>>> RC. >>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 7:49 AM, Bolke de Bruin >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I upgraded our production environment today. Some >>>>>>>>>>>>>> observations >>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Database migration (add max tries) didn=E2=80=99t = workout of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> box >>>>>>>>>>> correctly >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for Postgres. =E2=80=9Cmax_tries =3D False=E2=80=9D = didn=E2=80=99t work and needed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>> casted >>>>>>>>>>> to an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> int. Not sure how this gets to be false. This is a block = imho >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. SSHExecuteOperator not having backwards compatibility >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sucks. We >>>>>>>>>>> needed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to rework quite a lot of dags 3. We use LdAP for logins. = We >>>>>>>>>>>>>> havent configured the =E2=80=98superuser=E2=80=99 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> =E2=80=98data_profiler=E2=80=99 groups and thus should = have automatic >>>>>>>>>>>>>> superuser >>>>>>>>>>> privileges. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We don=E2=80=99t at the moment (eg. we cannot manage = connections or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> see >>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> admin >>>>>>>>>>>>>> screens). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> After fixing #1, the rest seems quite normal. Happy with = the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>>> logging. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bolke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Oct 2017, at 12:16, Driesprong, Fokko >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Bolke, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This one is a blocker: https://issues.apache.org/jira >>>>>>>>>>>>>> /browse/AIRFLOW-1731. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This requirers that we are sure that the /plugin/ folder = is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> path: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> = https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/eb2f589099b >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 87743482c2eb16261b49e284dcd96/airflow/plugins_manager.py >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And maybe add an additional test and updating the docs a = bit. >>>>>>>>>>> Hopefully >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere in the next few days, however I'm a bit busy = with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> Spark >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Summit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, Fokko >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-19 21:03 GMT+02:00 Bolke de Bruin = >> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Im planning to upgrade our production to 1.9.0alphaX >> tomorrow. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the issues that are open? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bolke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9 Oct 2017, at 20:24, Chris Riccomini < >>>>>> criccomini@apache.org >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> K, I will plan on cutting an alpha1 later this week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Something >>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guys to play with. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Bolke de Bruin < >>>>>>>>> bdbruin@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hi Chris, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are still running pre alpha. I am a bit preoccupied >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>> preparing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a conference and the team is readying a release of = one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>> our >>>>>>>>>>> core >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> products. So it will probably will be after this week = when >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I get >>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hands >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dirty again. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bolke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 4 okt. 2017 om 23:35 heeft Chris Riccomini < >>>>>>>>>>> criccomini@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > het volgende = geschreven: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Checking in. Has anyone tested this in their = environments? >>>>>>>> Stable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> depend on community involvement. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Chris Riccomini < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criccomini@apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've added AIRFLOW-1635 to the v1-9-test branch. = It's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not in >>>>>>>>>>> alpha0, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will be included in alpha1. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Feng Lu >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Chris, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know it's annoying to have last minute commit com = in, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> highly desirable feature for folks using GCP = operators, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include AIRFLOW-1635 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> = >>>>> b3e985a3 >>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> = https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/commit/b3e985a3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 146272ecfd3ceaaa0d8567e4e9e117d4> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> More than happy to offer help if there's something = I can >>>> do. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feng >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Chris Riccomini < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criccomini@apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have cut a 1.9.0alpha0 release of Airflow. You = can >>>>>>>> download >>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> = https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/airfl >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ow/1 >>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9.0alpha0/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> airflow/1.9.0alpha0/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bin tarball can be installed with pip: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pip install apache-airflow-1.9.0alpha0+ >>>>>>>> incubating-bin.tar.gz >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The goal is to have the community install and run = this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> expose >>>>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bugs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before we move on to official release candidates. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here are the outstanding blocker bugs for 1.9.0: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1525 |Improvement |Fix minor LICENSE & = NOTICE >>>> issue >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1258 |Bug |TaskInstances within >>>>>>>> SubDagOperator >>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marked >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1055 |Bug = |airflow/jobs.py:create_dag_ >>>>>> run() >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exception >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1018 |Bug |Scheduler DAG processes = can >>>> not >>>>>>>> log >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stdout >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1013 |Bug >> |airflow/jobs.py:manage_slas() >>>>>>>>>>>>>> exception >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @once >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-976 |Bug |Mark success running = task >>>> causes >>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Chris Riccomini < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criccomini@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Welp. Work got in the way, so I'll cut the beta = on >>>> Monday. >>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Chris Riccomini = < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criccomini@apache.org = > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Works for me. Will try and cut a beta before end = of >>>> week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blockers for 1.9.0 are: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1611 |Bug |Customize logging in >> Airflow >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1525 |Improvement |Fix minor LICENSE & >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOTICE >>>>>>>> issue >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1258 |Bug |TaskInstances within >>>>>>>>> SubDagOperator >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marked >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-976 |Bug |Mark success running = task >>>>>>>> causes >>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Bolke de Bruin = < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bdbruin@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can I suggest releasing a beta? The stable = branch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>> only >>>>>>>>> cut >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time. Betas allow us a broader exposure. It = also >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gives >>>>>>>> us a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In addition the list below are mostly longer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> standing >>>>>>>>> issues >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also part of the 1.8.x branch. Maybe only = consider >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1611, >>>>>>>>>>> 1525, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1258, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 976 as blocker? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bolke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 28 sep. 2017 om 19:49 heeft Chris Riccomini = < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criccomini@apache.org = > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> het volgende geschreven: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was planning to cut a 1.9.0 stable branch = and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0 >>>>>>>> beta >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seeing as there are several outstanding bugs, = I'm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delay. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the bugs that I'm tracking: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1611 |Bug |Customize logging = in >>>> Airflow >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1525 |Improvement |Fix minor LICENSE & >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOTICE >>>>>>>>> issue >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1258 |Bug |TaskInstances = within >>>>>>>>>>> SubDagOperator >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marked as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1055 |Bug >>>> |airflow/jobs.py:create_dag_ >>>>>>>>> run() >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exception >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1018 |Bug |Scheduler DAG = processes >>>> can >>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>> log >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stdout >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1013 |Bug >>>>>> |airflow/jobs.py:manage_slas() >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exception >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for @once >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-988 |Bug |SLA Miss Callbacks = Are >>>>>>>> Repeated >>>>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Email >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-976 |Bug |Mark success = running >> task >>>>>>>>> causes >>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> These are the priority issues. Once they're >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merged, >>>>>> I'll >>>>>>>>> cut >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> v1-9-stable and beta release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you can help clean this up, that would be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really >>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Chris = Riccomini >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criccomini@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marked it for 1.9.0. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Charlie = Jones < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cjones@simpli.fi > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any chance we could include = AIRFLOW-988 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>> 1.9.0? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> SLA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are not working correctly without emails... = Its >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not a >>>>>>>>>>> major >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does cause us some annoyance in our current >>>>>>>> deployment. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Link to Jira: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> = https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-98 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8 < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-988> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Link to PR: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ >>>>>> incubator-airflow/pull/2415 >>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2415> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Charlie Jones >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CHARLIE JONES >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Data Engineer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cjones@simpli.fi = | >> M: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 972.821.7631 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> = ________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> __ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Programmatic Performance.* Localized.* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> = ________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> __ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1407 Texas Street | Suite 202 | Fort = Worth, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TX >>>>>>>> 76102 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 800.840.0768 | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.simpli.fi < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.simpli.fi/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Riccomini < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criccomini@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Merged. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Ryan = Buckley < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ryan.buckley@bluecore.com >>>>>>> ryan.buckley@bluecore >>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>> com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would it be possible to include = AIRFLOW-1587? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running dags from the UI is currently = broken >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the >>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> due >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ >>>>>>>> incubator-airflow/pull/2590 >>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2590> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ryan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 8:14 AM, = Driesprong, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fokko >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to include AIRFLOW-1611 in = the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ >>>>>>>>> incubator-airflow/pull/2631 >>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2631> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently importing a custom logging >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> far >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know). Any feedback on the PR would also = be >>>>>>>>>>> appreciated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, Fokko >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-25 23:27 GMT+02:00 Chris = Riccomini < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criccomini@apache.org = >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 5:11 AM, Michael >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Crawford >>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> michael.crawford@modernizingmedicine.com >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> michael.crawford@modernizingmedicine.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you slide the aws and emr = connection >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type >>>>>> fix >>>>>>>>> in? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ >>>>>>>> jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1636 >>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1636> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ >>>>>>>> jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1636 >>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1636>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ >>>>>>>>>>> incubator-airflow/pull/2626 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2626> = < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ >>>>>>>>>>> incubator-airflow/pull/2626 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2626>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It keeps the connection type from = getting >>>>>> blanked >>>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> edit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 21, 2017, at 1:27 PM, Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Riccomini < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criccomini@apache.org >>>>> criccomini@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Absolutely. Just cherry-picked. I've = been >>>>>>>> looking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forward >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixes! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guziel < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.guziel@airbnb.com >>>>>>> alex.guziel@airbnb.com >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> invalid >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we get this in? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ >>>>>>>>> jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1519 >>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1519> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ >>>>>>>>> jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1621 >>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1621> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ >>>>>>>>>>> incubator-airflow/commit/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/commit/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> = b6d2e0a46978e93e16576604624f57d1388814f2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ >>>>>>>>>>> incubator-airflow/commit/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/commit/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> = 656d045e90bf67ca484a3778b2a07a419bfb324a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It speeds up loading times a lot, so = it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> good >>>>>>>>>>>>>> thing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:14 AM, = Chris >>>>>>>>> Riccomini < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criccomini@apache.org >>>>>>>> criccomini@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good. I'll plan on = stable+beta >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next >>>>>>>> week, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> then. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Initial >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> warning >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stands, that I will start locking = down >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:10 AM, = Bolke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> de >>>>>>>>> Bruin < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bdbruin@gmail.com = > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No vote indeed, just to gather = feedback >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particular >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time. It also gives a bit more = trust to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>> tarball >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pull. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bolke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Sep 2017, at 20:09, Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Riccomini >>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criccomini@apache.org >>>>> criccomini@apache.org >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can do a beta. Is the process >>>>>>>> significantly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IIRC, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basically the same, just no vote, >> right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:56 AM, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bolke de >>>>>>>>>>> Bruin < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bdbruin@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you sure you want to go ahead = and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do >>>>>>>> RCs >>>>>>>>>>>>>> right >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> away? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Isn=E2=80=99t a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beta >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit smarter? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Bolke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Sep 2017, at 19:41, Chris >>>>>> Riccomini >>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criccomini@apache.org >>>>>>> criccomini@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to send out a warning = that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm >>>>>>>>> planning >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next week, and begin the RC1 = release >>>>>> vote. >>>>>>>>>>> Once >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut, I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will be locking down what = commits >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>> cherry >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> picked >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will only be doing PRs that are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> required >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:19 = AM, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Riccomini >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criccomini@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> criccomini@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> An update on the 1.9.0 release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here >>>>>> are >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outstanding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PRs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slated to be included into = 1.9.0: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ISSUE ID |STATUS >> |DESCRIPTION >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1617 |Open |XSS >>>>>>>>> Vulnerability in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Variable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> endpoint >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1611 |Open = |Customize >>>>>>>>> logging in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Airflow >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1605 |Reopened |Fix = log >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> local >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> loggers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1604 |Open |Rename = the >>>>>>>>> logger to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> log >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1525 |Open |Fix = minor >>>>>>>>> LICENSE & >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOTICE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1499 |In = Progres|Eliminate >>>>>>>>> duplicate >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unneeded >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1198 |Open >> |HDFSOperator >>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> operate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HDFS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1055 |Open >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |airflow/jobs.py:create_dag_ru >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> n() >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exception >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1019 |Open >>>> |active_dagruns >>>>>>>>>>>>>> shouldn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paused >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DAGs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1018 |Open = |Scheduler >>>> DAG >>>>>>>>>>>>>> processes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> log >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stdout >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1015 |Open = |TreeView >>>>>>>>> displayed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> over >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> task >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instances >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-1013 |Open >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |airflow/jobs.py:manage_slas() >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exception >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @once >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-976 |Open |Mark >> success >>>>>>>>> running >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> task >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-914 |Open = |Refactor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BackfillJobTest.test_backfill_ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-913 |Open = |Refactor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests.CoreTest.test_scheduler_ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> job >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> real >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-912 |Open = |Refactor >>>> tests >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> build >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matrix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-888 |Open = |Operators >>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> push >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> XComs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> default >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-828 |Open |Add >> maximum >>>>>>>> size >>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> XComs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-825 |Open |Add >> Dataflow >>>>>>>>>>> semantics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AIRFLOW-788 |Open = |Context >>>>>>>>> unexpectedly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> added to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hive >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will be locking down what can = get >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-picked >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortly, so if you have = something >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>> want >>>>>>>>>>> in, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 1.9.0. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We (at WePay) have deployed = 1.9.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into >>>>>>>> our >>>>>>>>>>> dev >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cluster, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running smoothly for several = days. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ** I could really use help >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verifying >>>>>>>>>>> stability. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Airflow, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in your best interest to deploy = the >>>>>>>> 1.9.0 >>>>>>>>>>> test >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verify >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's working for your workload. = ** >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> = -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>=20 >>>> Intel Technology Poland sp. z o.o. >>>> ul. Slowackiego 173 | 80-298 Gdansk | Sad Rejonowy Gdansk Polnoc | = VII >>>> Wydzial Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sadowego - KRS 101882 | NIP >>>> 957-07-52-316 | Kapital zakladowy 200.000 PLN. >>>>=20 >>>> Ta wiadomosc wraz z zalacznikami jest przeznaczona dla okreslonego >>>> adresata i moze zawierac informacje poufne. W razie przypadkowego >>>> otrzymania tej wiadomosci, prosimy o powiadomienie nadawcy oraz = trwale >> jej >>>> usuniecie; jakiekolwiek >>>> przegladanie lub rozpowszechnianie jest zabronione. >>>> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material = for >> the >>>> sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended >>>> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies; any = review >> or >>>> distribution by >>>> others is strictly prohibited. >>>>=20 >>=20 >>=20