airflow-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sergei Iakhnin <lle...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 1.9.0
Date Thu, 07 Sep 2017 19:11:56 GMT
The Kubernetes features would be exciting to have. Do you think these will
make it into this release?

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:22 PM Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com> wrote:

> Would be appreciated!
>
> Op 7 sep. 2017 8:06 p.m. schreef "Chris Riccomini" <criccomini@apache.org
> >:
>
> > @Bolke, I can wait to cut the test branch until that PR is merged, if you
> > like.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > One of my team members is preparing a comprehensive PR that reworks all
> > > logging to use the standard framework that was recently introduced. It
> is
> > > expected to be become public tomorrow. So please don't cut too early
> ;-).
> > > In addition it would be nice to have a PR clean up? Some PRs have been
> > > waiting for some time.
> > >
> > > BTW: we will maintain 1.8.X for bug fixes until  1.10/2.0 comes along.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Bolke
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > > > On 7 Sep 2017, at 18:55, Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > The workflow is documented here:
> > > >
> > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Releasing+Airflow
> > > >
> > > > I'll probably cut the 1.9.0 test branch today or tomorrow, depending
> on
> > > > schedule. I'll let folks know when it's cut via dev@.
> > > >
> > > >> Once the branch is cut does that mean no more PRs will be included
> in
> > > the
> > > > release, or can some changes still be cherry-picked/merged in?
> > > >
> > > > We can still cherry-pick PRs in. Very quickly, though, we begin
> > rejecting
> > > > any PRs that aren't bug fixes. It's a big exercise to stabilize these
> > > > releases, so I will start rejecting merging non-bug fix PRs pretty
> > > quickly.
> > > > Probably within a couple of weeks.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Ash Berlin-Taylor <
> > > > ash_airflowlist@firemirror.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> What is the workflow? Once the branch is cut does that mean no more
> > PRs
> > > >> will be included in the release, or can some changes still be
> > > >> cherry-picked/merged in?
> > > >>
> > > >> (Is this documented somewhere I can read?)
> > > >>
> > > >> Oh, and thing someone in gitter chat pointed out: the CHANGELOG on
> > > master
> > > >> doesn't include entries for 1.8.2.
> > > >>
> > > >> -ash
> > > >>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 17:28, Andrew Chen <andrewchen@databricks.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Any estimate when branch 1.9 will be cut?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Maxime Beauchemin <
> > > >>> maximebeauchemin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Go for it! Still trying to wrap up 1.8.2 ...
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Max
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Awesome!
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 17:04, Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org
> >
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Hey all,
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I want to get the ball rolling on 1.9.0, now that
1.8.2 is out
> the
> > > >>>> door.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> @Max, I recall you mentioning driving this, but if
you're burnt
> > out
> > > >>>> after
> > > >>>>>> the 1.8.2 work, Joy and I can drive 1.9.0. Just let
me know.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Cheers,
> > > >>>>>> Chris
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
-- 

Sergei

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message