airflow-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 1.9.0
Date Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:08:14 GMT
The + is for local identifiers. Alpha is an official state. So it should be 1.9.0alpha0

Bolke

Sent from my iPhone

> On 13 Sep 2017, at 19:01, Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> > But do use alpha/beta please in your versioning for 1.9 for now please. 
> 
> 1.9.0alpha, or 1.9.0+alpha? The PEP is a little fuzzy to me.
> 
>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> But do use alpha/beta please in your versioning for 1.9 for now please. 
>> 
>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>> 
>>> Op 13 sep. 2017 om 18:51 heeft Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org>
het volgende geschreven:
>>> 
>>> Hey all,
>>> 
>>> I cut a 1.9.0 test branch:
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/tree/v1-9-test
>>> 
>>> One question on versioning: should I switch the version in the branch to 1.9.0,
and bump the master version to 1.10.0dev0+incubating?
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Chris
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org>
wrote:
>>>> Fantastic! I will cut a 1.9.0-test branch today!
>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> Small update: we are doing some quick iterations after some community
feedback (thanks @ash!) to make logging even more consistent. So, perfectly fine to cut 1.9.0
but I hope you allow us to merge some things in this area.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Things we would like to fix:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1. Move from LoggingMixing().log() —> import logging log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
>>>>> 2. Move from logger.xx —> log.XX everywhere
>>>>> 3. Maybe fix Dagprocessor logging
>>>>> 
>>>>> Shouldn’t take us too long, but we probably touch a lot of files due
to some refactoring.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Bolke
>>>>> 
>>>>> > On 13 Sep 2017, at 10:18, Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The PR has been merged. I hope you give 1.9.0 a bit of time to settle
(Alpha, beta, …) , so we can give this logging refactor some love…
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> On 11 Sep 2017, at 22:59, Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org>
wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> I'm waiting to cut 1.9.0 test until this lands. Can you please
post here
>>>>> >> when it is committed?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>> Small update: I expect the logging update to come in either
today or
>>>>> >>> tomorrow (Monday). Due to its nature - refactoring all logging
- it will be
>>>>> >>> massive. This is unfortunately unavoidable. Still I think
it is the right
>>>>> >>> thing to do for 1.9.0 otherwise it needs to wait another
major release
>>>>> >>> probably.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> Bolke
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>> Op 7 sep. 2017 om 21:26 heeft Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org>
>>>>> >>> het volgende geschreven:
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> Double negative for the win. Rephrase: Highly unlikely
K8s will make
>>>>> >>> 1.9.0.
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org>
>>>>> >>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>> Highly unlikely K8s will not make 1.9.0.
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Bolke de Bruin
<bdbruin@gmail.com>
>>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>> Depends on how fast it stabilizes...
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 21:11, Sergei Iakhnin
<llevar@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>> The Kubernetes features would be exciting
to have. Do you think these
>>>>> >>>>>> will
>>>>> >>>>>>> make it into this release?
>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:22 PM Bolke
de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com>
>>>>> >>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>> Would be appreciated!
>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>> Op 7 sep. 2017 8:06 p.m. schreef "Chris
Riccomini" <
>>>>> >>>>>> criccomini@apache.org
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> :
>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> @Bolke, I can wait to cut the test
branch until that PR is merged,
>>>>> >>> if
>>>>> >>>>>> you
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> like.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:19 AM,
Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com>
>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> One of my team members is preparing
a comprehensive PR that reworks
>>>>> >>>>>> all
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> logging to use the standard
framework that was recently introduced.
>>>>> >>>>>> It
>>>>> >>>>>>>> is
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> expected to be become public
tomorrow. So please don't cut too
>>>>> >>> early
>>>>> >>>>>>>> ;-).
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In addition it would be nice
to have a PR clean up? Some PRs have
>>>>> >>>>>> been
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> waiting for some time.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> BTW: we will maintain 1.8.X
for bug fixes until  1.10/2.0 comes
>>>>> >>>>>> along.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Bolke
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 18:55,
Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The workflow is documented
here:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/
>>>>> >>> Releasing+Airflow
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'll probably cut the 1.9.0
test branch today or tomorrow,
>>>>> >>> depending
>>>>> >>>>>>>> on
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> schedule. I'll let folks
know when it's cut via dev@.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Once the branch is cut
does that mean no more PRs will be
>>>>> >>> included
>>>>> >>>>>>>> in
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> release, or can some changes
still be cherry-picked/merged in?
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We can still cherry-pick
PRs in. Very quickly, though, we begin
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> rejecting
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> any PRs that aren't bug
fixes. It's a big exercise to stabilize
>>>>> >>>>>> these
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> releases, so I will start
rejecting merging non-bug fix PRs pretty
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> quickly.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Probably within a couple
of weeks.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:31
AM, Ash Berlin-Taylor <
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ash_airflowlist@firemirror.com>
wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What is the workflow?
Once the branch is cut does that mean no
>>>>> >>> more
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> PRs
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> will be included in
the release, or can some changes still be
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-picked/merged
in?
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (Is this documented
somewhere I can read?)
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, and thing someone
in gitter chat pointed out: the CHANGELOG
>>>>> >>> on
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> master
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't include entries
for 1.8.2.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -ash
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Sep 2017, at
17:28, Andrew Chen <andrewchen@databricks.com
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Any estimate when
branch 1.9 will be cut?
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017
at 9:25 AM, Maxime Beauchemin <
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> maximebeauchemin@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Go for it! Still
trying to wrap up 1.8.2 ...
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Max
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep
7, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Bolke de Bruin <
>>>>> >>>>>> bdbruin@gmail.com
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome!
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7
Sep 2017, at 17:04, Chris Riccomini <
>>>>> >>>>>> criccomini@apache.org
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey
all,
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want
to get the ball rolling on 1.9.0, now that 1.8.2 is
>>>>> >>> out
>>>>> >>>>>>>> the
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> door.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Max,
I recall you mentioning driving this, but if you're
>>>>> >>> burnt
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> out
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
1.8.2 work, Joy and I can drive 1.9.0. Just let me know.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>> --
>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>> Sergei
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
> 

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, 7-Bit, 0 bytes)
View raw message