Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C5D200CD9 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 03:16:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 071F416A534; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:16:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B1DF16A530 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 03:16:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 43606 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2017 01:16:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airflow.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43591 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2017 01:16:49 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:16:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BFA771805BF for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:16:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.022 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.022 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_NUMSUBJECT=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HztAau_01VS9 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with SMTP id BA85F5F2AB for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:16:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43572 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2017 01:16:45 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:16:45 +0000 Received: from mail-qt0-f178.google.com (mail-qt0-f178.google.com [209.85.216.178]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 246E61A002E for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:16:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt0-f178.google.com with SMTP id n42so12926733qtn.0 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 18:16:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112JdiphDu2KVhwA50Ul1X9rHhlPJQOiZe3cRSQ5pCujLj3CCNF0 WOvqZ5mPy3zvS1sBY7cm7KBbyvR6zA== X-Received: by 10.200.56.54 with SMTP id q51mr2824210qtb.338.1500513404519; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 18:16:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.200.37.135 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 18:16:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <0CA6E72E-1C84-4C15-98FD-E02EBD899628@gmail.com> <10A2359D-8722-4E1C-93CE-109FD34DEF58@gmail.com> From: siddharth anand Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 18:16:43 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 1.8.2 based on Airflow 1.8.2 RC2 To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113e64d8750bc00554b580ec" archived-at: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:16:51 -0000 --001a113e64d8750bc00554b580ec Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable FYI, can anyone pictorially describe the release process (and post it on the apache airflow wiki)? I think that would eliminate a lot of confusion in the future and avoid a rehash of this email thread on the next release. -s On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Hitesh Shah wrote: > To add, the main source tarball should have instructions to generate the > sdist and bdist versions. Additionally, as part of the release process if > the plan is to publish to pypi (after the IPMC vote succeeds), then the > appropriate bits also need to be verified/voted upon. There are not exact= ly > counted as the official release bits but they do need to be verified as > part of the voting process to ensure that the bits do indeed map to the > source release, license/notice files are correct, etc. > > thanks > -- Hitesh > > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Bolke de Bruin > wrote: > > > Thanks Hitesh. We discussed it with John Ament on the IPMC. Python has > the > > notion of 3 types of distributions, =E2=80=9Csource=E2=80=9D, =E2=80=9C= sdist=E2=80=9D, =E2=80=9Cbdist=E2=80=9D, contrary > to > > Java that knows only two (source, bdist). We used to vote on =E2=80=9Cs= dist=E2=80=9D, > which > > was deemed incorrect. > > > > So, Max, indeed we need to vote on a tar.gz that contains build > > instructions in INSTALL to get to =E2=80=9Csdist=E2=80=9D. The build in= structions should > > also contain instruction how to run the license checks by Apache Rat. > Most > > of the work probably goes in the build instructions and verifying they > > work, but it should not be much. > > > > Any other clarification required? > > > > Bolke > > > > > --001a113e64d8750bc00554b580ec--