Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0B1200CD2 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 19:01:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 0A57916B28A; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:01:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 28BBB16B288 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 19:01:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 63856 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2017 17:01:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airflow.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 63842 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2017 17:01:02 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:01:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 68A9FC2CCB for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:01:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_NUMSUBJECT=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hFjQZsOf-bIl for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:00:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr0-f173.google.com (mail-wr0-f173.google.com [209.85.128.173]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 140135FCC6 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:00:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 12so146263264wrb.1 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:00:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=qF7vOvfyJxr0MnIHrNIsg8lOhyn+VAjBKZLYSPp4T1o=; b=Y/9sYLui2EimJnLjER2vs51edvL3BRBcxo+7uNolALTsl1RhEGsVXzLNvcHyR5A34H C2NZckOWe5xrsea6DoN8UFOWYKV1x0QIdq6nKdlWA9SUGbvL1ksBOhN8DrUk8XcnvVRb bKGwInshFI8dKYvuwIVIMM19pMborPrrr0gUkXEjXKMGH3fXF2gsvr0ja+8f+QKPIlyQ TZtlb5yaYBeeOPCCrFW72ZB2fqG+GzAo8o1jCscq0phYge//YK5+NrQ3ZfMONw1kHhCe z9LzHb8qAk6VAZcYa8SVoksEQR92QN9MwyxbOmysdutEz2ZhLduQFsOTV8V0PQwk/mcx zL2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=qF7vOvfyJxr0MnIHrNIsg8lOhyn+VAjBKZLYSPp4T1o=; b=iXk28Jlm+qzlVNe87rSad2RflbFsZqgIPvip6iwrupxEFg+kI/XFAm9HQQZceJ5EET 12xpmgeoGAjbamAH99NYGpDeCKdiv+7nlFGCOfGbDOMN7BmLdrRI48FalgP9v1mnMt3z An3JZAWfxxLxw4b9bkdl6nCsYbxNRD3BX97rMFyTZnKM6SperLThmWiRW5a3R2eQx5aZ 0/Q5lM8rqbLcpwu83uFsfJzKs2RT2sX8WW1L92/DuKA5TJ9my2ZIyhSqm4em+1oa2S2b wdieIZClkuhLDKoko9zTeC/7oNoDE1ADNopZf2OJiXeCHAwi1a/gXAhJiqffv9VlFeo8 b/og== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110n7nAi/q+Vxku2iFolqy0kDVPrEloWBNlpNZR5ChoSw0HdueSg 5RnIUnh3FgXkTn5hdlt1RLtN5k5OtQ== X-Received: by 10.223.134.76 with SMTP id 12mr4841341wrw.50.1501174848291; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:00:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.152.232 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:00:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <0CA6E72E-1C84-4C15-98FD-E02EBD899628@gmail.com> <10A2359D-8722-4E1C-93CE-109FD34DEF58@gmail.com> From: Maxime Beauchemin Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:00:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 1.8.2 based on Airflow 1.8.2 RC2 To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11491a40940dec05554f819b" archived-at: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:01:05 -0000 --001a11491a40940dec05554f819b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I need to re-package it with build instructions. I'm pretty sure this means another vote. I have time carved up to work on this today/tomorrow. Max On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Chris Riccomini wrote: > IMO, given the level of effort for 1.8.2, and how long it's taken, we > should not be re-voting right now unless something horrific happened to t= he > release. > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 9:54 PM, Pavel Martynov > wrote: > > > Hi, folks! > > > > AIRFLOW-935 issue marked as resolved and fix version is 1.8.2, but this > > commit contained in master branch only and not tagged by 1.8.2rc2. > > Can fix of this issue be released in 1.8.2? > > > > 2017-07-26 2:27 GMT+03:00 George Leslie-Waksman < > > george@cloverhealth.com.invalid>: > > > > > I've checked and we are no longer relying on the previous > > > LatestOnlyOperator behavior for any of our DAGs. > > > > > > This is not a dealbreaker (though I will need to keep it in mind). > > > > > > Thanks for asking, > > > --George > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:50 PM Maxime Beauchemin < > > > maximebeauchemin@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > [AIRFLOW-1296] is part of 1.8.2. > > > > > > > > Is this a dealbreaker for 1.8.2? > > > > > > > > Max > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:40 PM, George Leslie-Waksman < > > > > george@cloverhealth.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I hope that it's not too late for me to chime in but there is a > > > breaking > > > > > change in the behavior of LatestOnlyOperator. > > > > > > > > > > The change was introduced in > > > > > PR: https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2365 > > > > > Change: 333e0b3 [AIRFLOW-1296] Propagate SKIPPED to all downstrea= m > > > tasks > > > > > > > > > > Prior to this change, the LatestOnlyOperator would skip direct > > > downstream > > > > > but not indirect downstream; now it skips indirect downstream. > > > > > > > > > > This breaks the use of LatestOnlyOperator with TriggerRules that = do > > not > > > > > propagate skips. > > > > > > > > > > --George > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:08 PM Maxime Beauchemin < > > > > > maximebeauchemin@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I think I'm gathering a good picture of what is expected here. > I'll > > > try > > > > > to > > > > > > update the Confluence page as I go. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm hoping to get started tomorrow and package it early next > week. > > > > > > > > > > > > Max > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:16 PM, siddharth anand < > > sanand@apache.org> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > FYI, can anyone pictorially describe the release process (and > > post > > > it > > > > > on > > > > > > > the apache airflow wiki)? I think that would eliminate a lot = of > > > > > confusion > > > > > > > in the future and avoid a rehash of this email thread on the > next > > > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -s > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Hitesh Shah < > hitesh@apache.org > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To add, the main source tarball should have instructions to > > > > generate > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > sdist and bdist versions. Additionally, as part of the > release > > > > > process > > > > > > if > > > > > > > > the plan is to publish to pypi (after the IPMC vote > succeeds), > > > then > > > > > the > > > > > > > > appropriate bits also need to be verified/voted upon. There > are > > > not > > > > > > > exactly > > > > > > > > counted as the official release bits but they do need to be > > > > verified > > > > > as > > > > > > > > part of the voting process to ensure that the bits do indee= d > > map > > > to > > > > > the > > > > > > > > source release, license/notice files are correct, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > -- Hitesh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Bolke de Bruin < > > > > bdbruin@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Hitesh. We discussed it with John Ament on the IPM= C. > > > > Python > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > notion of 3 types of distributions, =E2=80=9Csource=E2=80= =9D, =E2=80=9Csdist=E2=80=9D, > > =E2=80=9Cbdist=E2=80=9D, > > > > > > > contrary > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > Java that knows only two (source, bdist). We used to vote > on > > > > > =E2=80=9Csdist=E2=80=9D, > > > > > > > > which > > > > > > > > > was deemed incorrect. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, Max, indeed we need to vote on a tar.gz that contains > > build > > > > > > > > > instructions in INSTALL to get to =E2=80=9Csdist=E2=80=9D= . The build > > > instructions > > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > > also contain instruction how to run the license checks by > > > Apache > > > > > Rat. > > > > > > > > Most > > > > > > > > > of the work probably goes in the build instructions and > > > verifying > > > > > > they > > > > > > > > > work, but it should not be much. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any other clarification required? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bolke > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > with best regards, Pavel Martynov > > > --001a11491a40940dec05554f819b--