Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E03200CD2 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 19:56:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 8316916B439; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:56:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id A0FC316B438 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 19:56:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 44835 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2017 17:56:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airflow.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 44823 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2017 17:56:06 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:56:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id AD5091A1A02 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:56:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.379 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.379 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, KAM_NUMSUBJECT=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZXqcIvpD7S7G for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com (mail-wm0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 286F35FBEA for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id t201so106108732wmt.1 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:56:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :references:in-reply-to:to; bh=808W/gGBmkPPaoDZDJY5buY07Bn2+jZhffcKVi254Ok=; b=GZlTotDhtQLSpnqaRrb++BkeygzQzg+KdQtLcSN/5Vs0KE9GGG25BFRCog8vdWO3Yx cowakqXMIPwvdozFNg76PYI03HvmOwAGuI37737VAZ5YdXH8GfP50TE5IIV1471d3uBa c4DA/QTk27ny/d8UCQmw7IXafLhx8RveBzuzYUCHBqDpWc6NHWYp+01cN0C76CmnuHs5 HcYV/S4oPbhmbYv//ny+0ZtbbMzGr5ImQ+Nj6RxrWw5R2mElsAyiJB+NDAJ5+/WWrT2Y c3Whvw18xU1www2sZTodC+ujCWTVBD5jGqjECnU5pDMUat0X3CJlOn8Vku+4yfv7WiJW qjuQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date :subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to:to; bh=808W/gGBmkPPaoDZDJY5buY07Bn2+jZhffcKVi254Ok=; b=V2QTnGx8RnaFdYlIwQ6hDVy4pAdmVXoigFQlvV6LceaNp8oNgNPrFhI1NigHtiMV/i 4lVPqh5BsiSbKXwxx87axkioW5O9CMrusVyfk/MVoOx3sgqxPpAHsHPLGEjYzp95gbEn 7cAB7yidUYGqye/BNYU550s+BBiB0APnu6n9Ivk85q4H8ZGt+dJc1NqPAjgvZCr8nZKv mB4Vzwn8PZlWoBB46y32v+D/709nsUjBvvH1IsBlm3YBdsPM0ftbaKfe4BMmhuLNRBT3 dzyfVGjXt+TcKUvtVifWs3S6QA6e4r9RVKD//dn2AxZ64TuvE/qu/StAvqL1X0Rwl8xY UCsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112l2JwlIlHj79G/ivzrEvZSoW9quSV4OHkrKUbOhUvLsj8fje3Y oUyyKNgPwc+qxxaW4P4= X-Received: by 10.80.172.81 with SMTP id w17mr4351832edc.149.1501178162227; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:56:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.12] (ip-217-103-182-24.ip.prioritytelecom.net. [217.103.182.24]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j4sm8476601edd.17.2017.07.27.10.56.01 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:56:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Bolke de Bruin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 19:56:00 +0200 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 1.8.2 based on Airflow 1.8.2 RC2 Message-Id: <51DE9FCE-79A2-4311-8B3E-2373D2E8406C@gmail.com> References: <0CA6E72E-1C84-4C15-98FD-E02EBD899628@gmail.com> <10A2359D-8722-4E1C-93CE-109FD34DEF58@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14G60) archived-at: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:56:08 -0000 Yep Sent from my iPhone > On 27 Jul 2017, at 19:00, Maxime Beauchemin w= rote: >=20 > I need to re-package it with build instructions. I'm pretty sure this mean= s > another vote. I have time carved up to work on this today/tomorrow. >=20 > Max >=20 > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Chris Riccomini > wrote: >=20 >> IMO, given the level of effort for 1.8.2, and how long it's taken, we >> should not be re-voting right now unless something horrific happened to t= he >> release. >>=20 >> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 9:54 PM, Pavel Martynov >> wrote: >>=20 >>> Hi, folks! >>>=20 >>> AIRFLOW-935 issue marked as resolved and fix version is 1.8.2, but this >>> commit contained in master branch only and not tagged by 1.8.2rc2. >>> Can fix of this issue be released in 1.8.2? >>>=20 >>> 2017-07-26 2:27 GMT+03:00 George Leslie-Waksman < >>> george@cloverhealth.com.invalid>: >>>=20 >>>> I've checked and we are no longer relying on the previous >>>> LatestOnlyOperator behavior for any of our DAGs. >>>>=20 >>>> This is not a dealbreaker (though I will need to keep it in mind). >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks for asking, >>>> --George >>>>=20 >>>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:50 PM Maxime Beauchemin < >>>> maximebeauchemin@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> [AIRFLOW-1296] is part of 1.8.2. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Is this a dealbreaker for 1.8.2? >>>>>=20 >>>>> Max >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:40 PM, George Leslie-Waksman < >>>>> george@cloverhealth.com.invalid> wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>> I hope that it's not too late for me to chime in but there is a >>>> breaking >>>>>> change in the behavior of LatestOnlyOperator. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> The change was introduced in >>>>>> PR: https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2365 >>>>>> Change: 333e0b3 [AIRFLOW-1296] Propagate SKIPPED to all downstream >>>> tasks >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Prior to this change, the LatestOnlyOperator would skip direct >>>> downstream >>>>>> but not indirect downstream; now it skips indirect downstream. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> This breaks the use of LatestOnlyOperator with TriggerRules that do >>> not >>>>>> propagate skips. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> --George >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:08 PM Maxime Beauchemin < >>>>>> maximebeauchemin@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> I think I'm gathering a good picture of what is expected here. >> I'll >>>> try >>>>>> to >>>>>>> update the Confluence page as I go. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> I'm hoping to get started tomorrow and package it early next >> week. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Max >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:16 PM, siddharth anand < >>> sanand@apache.org> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> FYI, can anyone pictorially describe the release process (and >>> post >>>> it >>>>>> on >>>>>>>> the apache airflow wiki)? I think that would eliminate a lot of >>>>>> confusion >>>>>>>> in the future and avoid a rehash of this email thread on the >> next >>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> -s >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Hitesh Shah < >> hitesh@apache.org >>>>=20 >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> To add, the main source tarball should have instructions to >>>>> generate >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> sdist and bdist versions. Additionally, as part of the >> release >>>>>> process >>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>> the plan is to publish to pypi (after the IPMC vote >> succeeds), >>>> then >>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> appropriate bits also need to be verified/voted upon. There >> are >>>> not >>>>>>>> exactly >>>>>>>>> counted as the official release bits but they do need to be >>>>> verified >>>>>> as >>>>>>>>> part of the voting process to ensure that the bits do indeed >>> map >>>> to >>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> source release, license/notice files are correct, etc. >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>>>> -- Hitesh >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Bolke de Bruin < >>>>> bdbruin@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Hitesh. We discussed it with John Ament on the IPMC. >>>>> Python >>>>>>> has >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> notion of 3 types of distributions, =E2=80=9Csource=E2=80=9D, =E2= =80=9Csdist=E2=80=9D, >>> =E2=80=9Cbdist=E2=80=9D, >>>>>>>> contrary >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> Java that knows only two (source, bdist). We used to vote >> on >>>>>> =E2=80=9Csdist=E2=80=9D, >>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>> was deemed incorrect. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> So, Max, indeed we need to vote on a tar.gz that contains >>> build >>>>>>>>>> instructions in INSTALL to get to =E2=80=9Csdist=E2=80=9D. The bu= ild >>>> instructions >>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>> also contain instruction how to run the license checks by >>>> Apache >>>>>> Rat. >>>>>>>>> Most >>>>>>>>>> of the work probably goes in the build instructions and >>>> verifying >>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>> work, but it should not be much. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Any other clarification required? >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Bolke >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> -- >>> with best regards, Pavel Martynov >>>=20 >>=20