Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA650200C22 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 20:31:34 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id D8EB8160B68; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:31:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DD7A160B4F for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 20:31:34 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 31658 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2017 19:31:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airflow.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 31644 invoked by uid 99); 21 Feb 2017 19:31:33 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:31:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B91131A7ACF for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:31:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.519 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.519 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZZNiVYXTRIGX for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with SMTP id BD68F5FACC for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31634 invoked by uid 99); 21 Feb 2017 19:31:29 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:31:29 +0000 Received: from mail-it0-f54.google.com (mail-it0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id AFC0C1A00A2 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:31:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f54.google.com with SMTP id h10so116347762ith.1 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:31:29 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39l37osLhuPeYwbiH6FaYCB5CavzM8S5uaeX634xRNbIIV2704zbzsqFV18my5SfUIVLgMHidHZXlhGjrg== X-Received: by 10.107.136.195 with SMTP id s64mr19280977ioi.51.1487705488166; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:31:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.70.105 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:31:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <855743E9-32DD-41A7-8DD0-11260FEAD239@gmail.com> References: <855743E9-32DD-41A7-8DD0-11260FEAD239@gmail.com> From: Chris Riccomini Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:31:27 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Non-deterministic error in example_subdag_operator DAG To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ed2a227173505490f6dae archived-at: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:31:35 -0000 --001a113ed2a227173505490f6dae Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 OK, just a thought. :) On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Bolke de Bruin wrote: > Multiple tests use example bash operator, the mark success unit tests I > refactored to use a different dag. > > Nevertheless I had some issues that required me to refactor to use a > different test. However I think what Jeremiah is observing existed before > my update. > > Bolke > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 21 Feb 2017, at 20:09, Chris Riccomini wrote: > > > > Wonder if this has to do with the recent changes to subdag mark success > for > > RC4? > > > >> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Jeremiah Lowin > wrote: > >> > >> The unit test that runs the example_subdag_operator DAG is failing > >> non-deterministically. I see it sporadically in the Travis results, for > >> different environments, but I can't figure out what's causing the > failure > >> (and why it doesn't happen every time!) Anyone have a thought? > >> > >> Here's a log from a failed run, : > >> https://travis-ci.org/jlowin/airflow/jobs/203149863#L8494. This is the > >> same > >> master branch that's currently passing in the apache repo. > >> > >> J > >> > --001a113ed2a227173505490f6dae--