Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airflow.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHEEp7VVrb4f-Xdt2PC9hJvk0JLV69vuSuYk80MjMxGN8Py3hA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOqetn8LDCxN=yFvh0u6Kugbn2uiCnM=B41rDYajnEYRhw+QCg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABYbY7f2a1Hdmkv2MQg5LSjQzNKhj9M4H=FAVMm4QdnKd-uDEQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADsgxrHE3jOJEbsvKGtj3q=A2ikETjpd6W57fvuCG1xNoTz4KA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHEEp7VL4eChSrO79x8EpenSH4gX2Oxficc2xp1G4JtpwBAkOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHEEp7UcML351DiXdPAFeGxpOhxsDFHWYStLfF+PXDZgLbP7hw@mail.gmail.com>
 <5B3FB659-D828-425D-9A69-8B3550E68847@gmail.com> <CAHEEp7VVrb4f-Xdt2PC9hJvk0JLV69vuSuYk80MjMxGN8Py3hA@mail.gmail.com>
From: siddharth anand <sanand@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:53:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CANLtMidtPegiHbjgi2f=eqZMz3Yx5wQ2HcT+70vh3N_uQFW_NQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Projects using GitHub issues
To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d522eaabc9f05392041e6
archived-at: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:53:14 -0000

--001a113d522eaabc9f05392041e6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Mentors,
Any updates here?
I looked at the thread that Chris R had pasted to kick off this discussion.
The thread meandered. I saw a comment from Jim J stating :

Recall that issue trackers have not been, traditionally, held under
the requirement of being under ASF infra nor infra control. If people
wish to use external, 3rd party issue/bug trackers, they are taking on
the risks themselves, as far as SLAs, historical access, etc...


Does this mean that it's up to us to pick GH Issues?

-s

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Maxime Beauchemin <
maximebeauchemin@gmail.com> wrote:

> Oh right! Problem solved. I assumed wrong since I probably tried to edit
> someone else's title before and assumed I had lost all title editing
> rights...
>
> Max
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com> wrote=
:
>
> > You can edit your own pr titles just fine I think? I do it all the time
> at
> > least.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On 29 jun. 2016, at 18:09, Maxime Beauchemin <
> maximebeauchemin@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Somewhat related: Jira is down at the moment
> > >
> > > I'm ready to send a PR just now and knowing that I can't create the
> JIRA
> > issue, I can't get an ID for it. And I know I won't be able to edit the
> > title of my GH PR later since I don't have admin rights in GH. Checkmat=
e.
> > >
> > > -----------------
> > >
> > >
> > > =E2=80=8B
> > >
> > >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Maxime Beauchemin <
> > maximebeauchemin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Awesome! Somehow consistent and well integrated tools make quite a
> > difference.
> > >>
> > >> For first time or casual contributors it's annoying to create a JIRA
> > account to create a single issue to get an ID to paste into the GH PR,
> then
> > it can be unclear where to have the discussion. I hate to have to
> > walkthrough teammates (new contributors) through this process.
> > >>
> > >> I understand why Gnu doesn't like GH, I get it, it's the philosophic=
al
> > principle at the root of Gnu that is incompatible with GH. But Apache
> > choosing Atlassian is probably because that was the best option 5 or 10
> > years ago. Consistency across Apache projects is great, but consistency
> > with the open source movement is more important to me.
> > >>
> > >> Max
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Jeremiah Lowin <jlowin@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>> Thanks for the heads up Chris!
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:21 AM Chris Riccomini <
> > criccomini@apache.org>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > FYI- it sounds like there's some discussion about allowing GH
> issues
> > >>> > instead of JIRA.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > >>> > From: John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> > >>> > Date: Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 7:17 AM
> > >>> > Subject: Projects using GitHub issues
> > >>> > To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org>
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > All,
> > >>> >
> > >>> > I started a discussion on legal discuss, as I was told VP Legal
> > approved
> > >>> > using GitHub issues.  I have no specific concerns, other than
> > ensuring that
> > >>> > permissions are propagated.
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d2cb0eed30d72976a2f54893f132c1fe300a=
86d2fdbce1422763c9f0@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Its clear to me that legal-discuss isn't where this should start,
> so
> > I'm
> > >>> > not sure why VP Legal approved.  Anyways, I wanted to get opinion=
s
> > from the
> > >>> > incubator on who should be discussing this issue.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > John
> > >>> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

--001a113d522eaabc9f05392041e6--