Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airflow.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHEEp7URo_YzVLECNfjyzf2iOQ54Nj2jn3c8C28JTh=JjaetEA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADiKvVvhGUi6Y3pJvB1SWu0-yaGAEEed5=aXeg6HO_0vbgcFZw@mail.gmail.com>
 <FB36DEE3-5446-48D8-B505-E6EB7CC9AF79@gmail.com> <CAHEEp7URo_YzVLECNfjyzf2iOQ54Nj2jn3c8C28JTh=JjaetEA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jakob Homan <jghoman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 14:07:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CADiKvVvfiu9g9O=wVGmUrXCdqe1zt-YG-RmOLCQqX5+esXfFAg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Private channel being used for discussion on gitter
To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
archived-at: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 21:08:13 -0000

Gitter is fine and the public channel I linked to in the original
email is fine.  It's functionally no different than IRC.  The channel
just has to be open for any one rather than invite only.

-Jakob


On 22 August 2016 at 13:10, Maxime Beauchemin
<maximebeauchemin@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think Gitter must have just transferred along as we moved the repo. I'm
> personally open to using IRC.
>
> Max
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Also who is the owner of this room? It seems created by Apache so they
>> (INFRA?) can set it to public? Logs will be public then by default.
>>
>> Wasn't there some discussion on a more relaxed requirement of this
>> happening on ASF infrastructure?
>>
>> Bolke.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On 22 aug. 2016, at 20:29, Jakob Homan <jghoman@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hey all-
>> >  Apparently there is a private channel being used for project
>> > discussion on gitter (the archive would be here:
>> > https://gitter.im/apache/incubator-airflow/Airflow_
>> committers/archives/all,
>> > similar to the public archive of the regular gitter channel:
>> > https://gitter.im/apache/incubator-airflow/archives/all), titled
>> > "Airflow_committers."
>> >
>> > As has been discussed before, all non-PMC level ASF communication
>> > *has* to be in a public accessible forum (preferably that is archived
>> > to an ASF list).  Even if well intentioned, these channels are
>> > exclusionary and absolutely verboten per ASF.
>> >
>> > We need to open or shut that channel down and make sure we note this
>> > on the next IPMC report...
>> >
>> > -Jakob
>>