airflow-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jakob Homan <jgho...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: July 2016 Podling Report -- Draft
Date Wed, 06 Jul 2016 18:05:57 GMT
+1.  Signed off.  Good job.

-Jakob

On 6 July 2016 at 08:54, Chris Nauroth <cnauroth@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> This looks good.  I have entered my mentor sign-off.  Thank you, Gurer and
> Chris.
>
> --Chris Nauroth
>
>
>
>
> On 7/5/16, 8:42 PM, "Chris Riccomini" <criccomini@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>Hey all,
>>
>>I've updated the report. I've used Gurer's summary, but tweaked a couple
>>of
>>things based on feedback. Please have a look:
>>
>>  https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2016
>>
>>@Gurer, thanks so much for doing the leg work on this! Makes things much
>>easier. :)
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Chris
>>
>>On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Jakob Homan <jghoman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, I'm not sure we should have much about the non-ASF release in
>>> the report.  We ran a question by IPMC about the release, so doing the
>>> release itself was kosher, but having it dominate the report may not
>>> be good.  If we do include any reference to the non-ASF release, we
>>> should have a link to the Incubator discussion okaying it, to avoid
>>> any 'was-this-approved' questions (since a non-ASF release in
>>> incubation is not typical)" http://bit.ly/AirflowInFlightRelease.
>>>
>>> -Jakob
>>>
>>> On 5 July 2016 at 10:23, Chris Nauroth <cnauroth@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>> > Hello Gurer,
>>> >
>>> > Thank you for putting together the report.  This looks good to me
>>> overall,
>>> > after completing it by filling in each [placeholder].
>>> >
>>> > I have a question regarding "we had a release on...".  IIUC, this was
>>>not
>>> > an Apache release, but rather a release that followed the pre-Apache
>>> > process.  Am I right?  If so, then would you please clarify that in
>>>the
>>> > report?  If there has been progress on anything related to Apache
>>>release
>>> > process (e.g. license headers in source, writing a NOTICE file to
>>> > acknowledge licenses of dependencies, etc.) then that would be good to
>>> > mention too.
>>> >
>>> > --Chris Nauroth
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 7/5/16, 6:16 AM, "Gurer Kiratli" <gurer.kiratli@airbnb.com.INVALID>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>Hi folks,
>>> >>
>>> >>As promised, please see a draft for the July 2016 Podling report.
>>>Please
>>> >>provide your feedback as soon as possible as this is due by the end of
>>> day
>>> >>Wednesday July 6th.
>>> >>
>>> >>Cheers,
>>> >>
>>> >>Gurer
>>> >>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>
>>> >>   - *Project Name:* Airflow
>>> >>   - *Project Description:* Airflow is a workflow automation and
>>> >>scheduling
>>> >>   system that can be used to author and manage data pipelines.
>>>Airflow
>>> >>has
>>> >>   been incubating since 2016-03-31.
>>> >>   - *3 Issues to address before graduation:*
>>> >>      - An end to end testing framework for the whole community.
>>> >>      - The last and the only released was mostly managed by
>>>committers
>>> >>      from Airbnb, we need to have a joint release.
>>> >>      - Improve and extend documentation.
>>> >>   - *Issues that Incubator PMC or ASF Board need to know:*
>>> >>      - We had to revert the latest release couple times due to some
>>> buggy
>>> >>      code. This created a concern about lack of testing, review and
>>> >>      coordination. We are working on addressing these via cooperation
>>> >>guidelines
>>> >>      and principles.
>>> >>   - *How has the community developed since the last report?:*
>>> >>      - Since our last podling report 1 month ago, we grew our
>>> >>contributors
>>> >>      from 148 to 160.
>>> >>      - In June 2016 we had 56 commits.
>>> >>      - We organized a meet up at WePay. We also had one before at
>>> Airbnb.
>>> >>      - We had several[how many??] committers meetings.
>>> >>      - 1 new committer. 2 offers were given but 1 was declined.
>>> >>   - *How has the project developed since the last report.*
>>> >>      - We had a release on [exact date]!
>>> >
>>>
>

Mime
View raw message