Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id B329E200B2B for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 17:51:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id B1CA9160A56; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:51:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 06E14160A28 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 17:51:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 8551 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2016 15:51:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airflow.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 8540 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2016 15:51:24 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:51:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C5A541A73D6 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:51:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.446 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.446 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U8BHR2-_K5jK for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:51:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with SMTP id A3FC45F33E for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:51:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8519 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2016 15:51:21 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:51:21 +0000 Received: from mail-vk0-f46.google.com (mail-vk0-f46.google.com [209.85.213.46]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 334621A01BB for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f46.google.com with SMTP id j3so27911193vkb.0 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 08:51:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIx/7oT7+6OA3uPoYSVCyqtq0z7D0+hFzvr7azzqm0GgktO2TSuU04vY7Tt8dFkQW9QsbMQKIJT4TB31Q== X-Received: by 10.31.210.133 with SMTP id j127mr952007vkg.143.1467129080134; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 08:51:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jeremiah Lowin Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:51:10 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Projects using GitHub issues To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114e31f6a9670e0536589b50 archived-at: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:51:25 -0000 --001a114e31f6a9670e0536589b50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thanks for the heads up Chris! On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:21 AM Chris Riccomini wrote: > FYI- it sounds like there's some discussion about allowing GH issues > instead of JIRA. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: John D. Ament > Date: Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 7:17 AM > Subject: Projects using GitHub issues > To: "general@incubator.apache.org" > > > All, > > I started a discussion on legal discuss, as I was told VP Legal approved > using GitHub issues. I have no specific concerns, other than ensuring that > permissions are propagated. > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d2cb0eed30d72976a2f54893f132c1fe300a86d2fdbce1422763c9f0@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E > > Its clear to me that legal-discuss isn't where this should start, so I'm > not sure why VP Legal approved. Anyways, I wanted to get opinions from the > incubator on who should be discussing this issue. > > John > --001a114e31f6a9670e0536589b50--