Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1704A200C86 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 17:42:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 152E7160BDB; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:42:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AF72160BBA for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 17:42:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 96064 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2017 15:42:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airavata.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@airavata.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@airavata.apache.org Received: (qmail 96048 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2017 15:42:05 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:42:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 57583180314 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:42:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.298 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.298 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mx.aol.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ke91T-ghTg2R for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omr-a013e.mx.aol.com (omr-a013e.mx.aol.com [204.29.186.60]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 69AE05F5B4 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mtaomg-aan01.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-aan01.mx.aol.com [172.27.19.79]) by omr-a013e.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id B2886380009B for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 11:41:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from core-mba06h.mail.aol.com (core-mba06.mail.aol.com [172.27.44.6]) by mtaomg-aan01.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 636DC38000081 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 11:41:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 64.134.161.38 by webprd-a20.mail.aol.com (10.72.58.193) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 31 May 2017 11:41:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 11:41:55 -0400 From: Apoorv Palkar To: dev@airavata.apache.org Message-Id: <15c5f2ba64f-57a1-242b6@webprd-a20.mail.aol.com> Subject: wireless/openwhisk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_179703_77875769.1496245315149" X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: JAS STD X-Originating-IP: [64.134.161.38] x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1496245315; bh=x+LeryLr7ZQdr5Ip3b4YaEhUHKVFYQiFE18SY3Kdy8I=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=O+bPofxRtEhhm10ZaYYdHgSXk3iVCxEYG74X1T6/NZtZr4T62Ix5HIbRPcqb8uhYH FqTLAjnCLRH4c16c4f6Tud8Cv9VLLTjSGupLPmVVQb0dAawbA30hdIk034NJAIVsx9 DfSCPry0VC4zbtMPkLEkhxPIkxWPG6fTH1RmVE+Y= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1b134f592ee443295e archived-at: Wed, 31 May 2017 15:42:09 -0000 ------=_Part_179703_77875769.1496245315149 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xF_p4FUEK0rXJxC2i_fiBtTydAL5rcKD74PuSV9oyTo/edit?usp=sharing From my analysis, I think Storm && Flink are better than spark/openwhisk. So i created an analysis for openwhisk above. The documentation is not as good as the technology is new. Could serve as a problem for actual prototyping/development. thanks. ------=_Part_179703_77875769.1496245315149 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xF_p4FUEK0rXJxC2i_fiBtTydAL5rcKD74PuSV9oyTo/edit?usp=sharing


From my analysis, I think Storm && Flink are better than spark/openwhisk. So i created an analysis for openwhisk above. The documentation is not as good as the technology is new. Could serve as a problem for actual prototyping/development.

thanks.
 ------=_Part_179703_77875769.1496245315149--