Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airavata.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@airavata.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of samindaw@gmail.com designates
 209.85.215.53 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAKq9_6J1o8s3y3GWj5r9nbPYQhRsp-HcHQDE2Sr8qkfDwdRNxw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CABFJMzOWFfScoAhz5jbVoi0-xePW9eBkxNrQw4n+QLRPJcafYQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <8DFA5999-ED7B-42E5-B1DF-86FCB26A889B@apache.org>
 <CABFJMzO5aBGO49M-J3wz9oQvOqMqKsSY=uj_P44WdJ8jObJf0w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKq9_6J1o8s3y3GWj5r9nbPYQhRsp-HcHQDE2Sr8qkfDwdRNxw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Saminda Wijeratne <samindaw@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 13:38:20 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CANotcz4FvJ8JVjqNJhsiYK0dUjOJGYvJiE7hifieXv4pOu+YWA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Removing previous registry API usage from airavata components
To: dev <dev@airavata.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c35452fd5f8305012730ee

--001a11c35452fd5f8305012730ee
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

+1

I gather you've updated the app catalog to support workflows right?


On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake <glahiru@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Chathuri Wimalasena <
> kamalasini@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Lahiru,
>>
>> I have another question regarding GFac. We have two classes called
>> GFacImpl and BetterGFacImpl. Why are we using the both ? Is it ok if I
>> change all the places that uses GFacImpl to use BetterGFacImpl ?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Suresh Marru <smarru@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> + 1, great idea and thanks for volunteering Chathuri.
>>>
>>> But did we get GFac away from using it yet?
>>>
>>> Suresh
>>>
>>> On Aug 21, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Chathuri Wimalasena <kamalasini@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Devs,
>>> >
>>> > I'm planning to remove previous registry API (AiravataRegistry2) usage
>>> from airavata components. I believe we no longer need to rely on previous
>>> registry API. Please let me know if you have any objections or concerns.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks..
>>> > Chathuri
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> System Analyst Programmer
> PTI Lab
> Indiana University
>

--001a11c35452fd5f8305012730ee
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>+1<br><br></div>I gather you&#39;ve updated the app c=
atalog to support workflows right?<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br>=
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Lahiru Gun=
athilake <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:glahiru@gmail.com" target=
=3D"_blank">glahiru@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">+1</div><div class=3D"gmail=
_extra"><div><div class=3D"h5"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, A=
ug 21, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Chathuri Wimalasena <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:kamalasini@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">kamalasini@gmail.com</a>=
&gt;</span> wrote:<br>


<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">Hi Lahiru,=C2=A0<div><br></=
div><div>I have another question regarding GFac. We have two classes called=
 GFacImpl and BetterGFacImpl. Why are we using the both ? Is it ok if I cha=
nge all the places that uses GFacImpl to use BetterGFacImpl ?</div>


</div><div><div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quot=
e">On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Suresh Marru <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:smarru@apache.org" target=3D"_blank">smarru@apache.org</a>&g=
t;</span> wrote:<br>


<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">+ 1, great idea and thanks for volunteering =
Chathuri.<br>
<br>
But did we get GFac away from using it yet?<br>
<span><font color=3D"#888888"><br>
Suresh<br>
</font></span><div><div><br>
On Aug 21, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Chathuri Wimalasena &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:kam=
alasini@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">kamalasini@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br=
>
<br>
&gt; Hi Devs,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I&#39;m planning to remove previous registry API (AiravataRegistry2) u=
sage from airavata components. I believe we no longer need to rely on previ=
ous registry API. Please let me know if you have any objections or concerns=
.<br>


&gt;<br>
&gt; Thanks..<br>
&gt; Chathuri<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div></div><=
/div><div class=3D"">-- <br>System Analyst Programmer<div>PTI Lab</div><div=
>Indiana University</div>
</div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a11c35452fd5f8305012730ee--