Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03EC411F75 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:47:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8557 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2014 17:47:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@airavata.apache.org Received: (qmail 8506 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2014 17:47:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airavata.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@airavata.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@airavata.apache.org Received: (qmail 8496 invoked by uid 99); 21 Aug 2014 17:47:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:47:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of glahiru@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.180] (HELO mail-we0-f180.google.com) (74.125.82.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:47:50 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id w61so9613061wes.25 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 10:47:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=GpwITX0VCEVCbgeWQ5XnvSjUzoK+SuD3EP0vIdtQKPw=; b=wLao6RW7BbMMFI3NkyvZ9wGxCZz1DhWxsLo4qPd+n8OmkQrvbU0uOh7diNDWh8x2Ei zNv6WqBKLh+kdh6uSYjQQO76jwn+E4YFVYi/rliXeWga2lu/qCXGXca/pQEA5EAancm4 uMX19AjXetOD0XhatxT0TwXBY5ZePQcIepCJJZGccQKhoezLEU+t6aIkJdNi2KLh0Iyn Hwjul4vpOhiLYw5/nRYF/q5WoDrnWh2aGCeZbaAPs8G2Q8f+ZXM4Bin35Ief8c4pk2g0 s2T77LelipswOnPfdzY7eLFXBQraxtPg0dTA2Cj3KUIK/8F+OAhg9Yvga7QrqXifWZoM BOtQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.172.137 with SMTP id bc9mr152400wjc.72.1408643249034; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 10:47:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.199.66 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 10:47:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8DFA5999-ED7B-42E5-B1DF-86FCB26A889B@apache.org> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 23:17:28 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Removing previous registry API usage from airavata components From: Lahiru Gunathilake To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0122eed2795d99050127506c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0122eed2795d99050127506c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Saminda Wijeratne wrote: > +1 > > I gather you've updated the app catalog to support workflows right? > I haven't touched app-catalog or workflows. Regards Lahiru > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Chathuri Wimalasena < >> kamalasini@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Lahiru, >>> >>> I have another question regarding GFac. We have two classes called >>> GFacImpl and BetterGFacImpl. Why are we using the both ? Is it ok if I >>> change all the places that uses GFacImpl to use BetterGFacImpl ? >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Suresh Marru >>> wrote: >>> >>>> + 1, great idea and thanks for volunteering Chathuri. >>>> >>>> But did we get GFac away from using it yet? >>>> >>>> Suresh >>>> >>>> On Aug 21, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Chathuri Wimalasena >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Hi Devs, >>>> > >>>> > I'm planning to remove previous registry API (AiravataRegistry2) >>>> usage from airavata components. I believe we no longer need to rely on >>>> previous registry API. Please let me know if you have any objections or >>>> concerns. >>>> > >>>> > Thanks.. >>>> > Chathuri >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> System Analyst Programmer >> PTI Lab >> Indiana University >> > > -- System Analyst Programmer PTI Lab Indiana University --089e0122eed2795d99050127506c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Saminda Wijeratne <samindaw@gma= il.com> wrote:
+1

I gath= er you've updated the app catalog to support workflows right?
=
I haven't touched app-catalog or workflows.

Regards
Lahiru=C2=A0

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Lahiru G= unathilake <glahiru@gmail.com> wrote:
+1


On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 a= t 10:08 PM, Chathuri Wimalasena <kamalasini@gmail.com> wr= ote:
Hi Lahiru,=C2=A0

I have another question regarding GFac. We have two classes called= GFacImpl and BetterGFacImpl. Why are we using the both ? Is it ok if I cha= nge all the places that uses GFacImpl to use BetterGFacImpl ?


On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Suresh Marru <smarru@apache.org&g= t; wrote:
+ 1, great idea and thanks for volunteering = Chathuri.

But did we get GFac away from using it yet?

Suresh

On Aug 21, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Chathuri Wimalasena <kamalasini@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> I'm planning to remove previous registry API (AiravataRegistry2) u= sage from airavata components. I believe we no longer need to rely on previ= ous registry API. Please let me know if you have any objections or concerns= .
>
> Thanks..
> Chathuri





<= /div>
--
System Analyst Programmer
PTI Lab
Indiana Un= iversity




--
= System Analyst Programmer
PTI Lab
Indiana University
--089e0122eed2795d99050127506c--