Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-12168-apmail-airavata-dev-archive=airavata.apache.org@airavata.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7D0010412
	for <apmail-airavata-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Sun,  1 Jun 2014 13:35:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 76033 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2014 13:35:27 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@airavata.apache.org
Received: (qmail 75978 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2014 13:35:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airavata.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@airavata.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@airavata.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@airavata.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.airavata.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@airavata.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@airavata.apache.org
Received: (qmail 75971 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2014 13:35:27 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 13:35:27 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gagandeepjuneja@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.217.171 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.217.171] (HELO mail-lb0-f171.google.com)
 (209.85.217.171)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 13:35:23 +0000
Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 10so1941560lbg.2
        for <dev@airavata.apache.org>; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 06:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=JWA8faj6TCAYVIIC/HLgZt/z0FIcaT7vayv1hl21CgE=;
        b=0FKvN4RS5h+No50KirTCQnzdkGNeoFGVcKi6+iC3tVUjUoJgVqqhG9EgClsrwVdsbK
         ra3L5JvcEyhvsaEDOmMrCSAAVcbxHEIAhw43VGu6h5Ur6pOjsj/VasVjHDXl9wTAhNL/
         +xmksJkyTSP1rBpPNeawvMknt8n2UBVXzYY/5JsHR46FZ0SOKoylpcl+IvA7T8iYHneW
         0xn5eQiyZvWv0u9MBuyrjAmlFpe4bWodgw6nHgzQg3LXIN4ZVU8PVjJJEs81bXXwPXBi
         rNd2xS30ebX1o2A/xHlHfN1/WoNRaNshSYtY3yDx3rx65HGAfya6m0SwA09/8x2z6Pnx
         ICSw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.22.169 with SMTP id e9mr23648169laf.51.1401629699771;
 Sun, 01 Jun 2014 06:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.130.97 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 06:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 19:04:59 +0530
Message-ID: 
 <CADF2qNmpWj_U2D0qA+oJm235L6FD3QdxRAmQYLWoUULJcux6fg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Query
From: Gagan Juneja <gagandeepjuneja@gmail.com>
To: dev@airavata.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160bf8a5c943a04fac6585e
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--089e0160bf8a5c943a04fac6585e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi All,

While exploring the code I found that we are using Thrift implementation of
TThreadPoolServer with default 30 threads. As per my experience, this
Thrift server implementation is very resource intensive though it gives
good performance is some scenarios. Are we establishing peer to peer
connections?



Regards,
Gagan

--089e0160bf8a5c943a04fac6585e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi All,<div><br></div><div>While exploring the code I foun=
d that we are using Thrift implementation of TThreadPoolServer with default=
 30 threads. As per my experience, this Thrift server implementation is ver=
y resource intensive though it gives good performance is some scenarios. Ar=
e we establishing peer to peer connections?</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Gagan<=
/div><div><br></div></div>

--089e0160bf8a5c943a04fac6585e--