Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5840210DB8 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96810 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2014 15:17:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@airavata.apache.org Received: (qmail 96684 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2014 15:17:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airavata.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@airavata.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@airavata.apache.org Received: (qmail 96670 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2014 15:17:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:17:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [198.66.255.242] (HELO vownet.net) (198.66.255.242) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:17:37 +0000 Received: from [192.168.3.18] (cust-71-41-148-17.vownet.net [71.41.148.17] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by vownet.net (8.14.5/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s2LFHARj070724 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:17:13 GMT Message-ID: <532C57F7.2090308@biochem.uthscsa.edu> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:17:11 -0500 From: Emre Brookes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/24.0 SeaMonkey/2.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@airavata.apache.org Subject: Re: [GSoC 2014] Integration of GenApp with Apache Airavata References: <532B4055.9000207@iu.edu> <532C4C23.8090409@biochem.uthscsa.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Nadeem, I am fine with this, I just wanted to verify you understood the situation. I think it would be good to have the Java/FX2 working, so this may motivate me to do it. Thanks, Emrer Nadeem Anjum wrote: > Hi Emre, > > I think it will be good to have Java interfaces integrated as well, so > I had left it in the proposal. > > Just in case, its not possible to have a Java/FX2 version in time, we > might utilize that period of the timeline for some other task, which > we can decide upon later. > > Let me know if you have some other opinion on this. > > Thanks, > Nadeem