Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D7A81037F for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72926 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2014 16:00:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@airavata.apache.org Received: (qmail 72882 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2014 16:00:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airavata.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@airavata.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@airavata.apache.org Received: (qmail 72738 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2014 15:59:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:59:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of swsachith@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.173] (HELO mail-wi0-f173.google.com) (209.85.212.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:59:55 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id d13so3364186wiw.6 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 07:59:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=O2BC/KvR/+E6pmJcJ3aXp6yFbK6Z4m6zVaOx6YtEeg4=; b=w89nwb/ljkNjATKkHYyeFlySvpryAEazAwh8bOFcRyy2LTGZKcvUaMECQcMtb954We Vc9BYwaeqL5pXFRp96UQkfeXUsGPyAf79YJFfcT3vHA3KYLDtRjbeNenTuuN+NzF1exB zeBNEURNoq2nhMs8YCisAXwmv+P+tvCMPdzSHqFu4sY2VcY5wgEHK8v9dYxghR3VyELh OftlXB98oKl3kQubX+sJ8TDDG2dUc4doWp9au//9IUnEedrmAHSy5DOa340xMcI+J1I+ +2UAibaEOCqoPhigkjnhci1ksl/W6y+0IcwwqJhKeXh+rhVnzjpmNd0GPsha/CjwdhiR vzng== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.174.4 with SMTP id bo4mr2304153wjc.62.1390233573762; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 07:59:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.170.195 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 07:59:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52DD3406.3050907@iu.edu> References: <52DD3406.3050907@iu.edu> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:59:33 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Orchestrator Multi-Threaded vs Single Threaded From: Sachith Withana To: dev@airavata.apache.org, architecture@airavata.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d0c7a51aca504f068faf9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e013d0c7a51aca504f068faf9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, There are race condition issues when using the multi-threaded Orchestrator. We need to come up with a way to synchronize the threads. Does anyone have any experiences or ideas regarding the issue? On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Marlon Pierce wrote: > This sounds like a good question for the architects@airavata list. > > > Marlon > > On 1/20/14 2:29 AM, Saminda Wijeratne wrote: > > Suresh suggested we use existing libraries. Does anyone have any > experience > > in using them? > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake >wrote: > > > >> Hi Sachitha, > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Sachith Withana >wrote: > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> There are race condition issues when using the multi-threaded > >>> Orchestrator. > >>> > >> +1, There's another thread we agreed on this. (subject: Orchestration > >> Component implementation review). > >> > >> Lahiru > >> > >>> We need to come up with a way to synchronize the threads. > >>> > >>> Any suggestions? > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Thanks, > >>> Sachith Withana > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> System Analyst Programmer > >> PTI Lab > >> Indiana University > >> > > -- Thanks, Sachith Withana --089e013d0c7a51aca504f068faf9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,
=
There = are race condition issues when using the multi-threaded Orchestrator. We ne= ed to come up with a way to synchronize the threads.=A0

Does anyone have any e= xperiences or ideas regarding the issue?


On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Marlon = Pierce <marpierc@iu.edu> wrote:
This sounds like a good question for the architects@airavata list.


Marlon

On 1/20/14 2:29 AM, Saminda Wijeratne wrote:
> Suresh suggested we use existing libraries. Does anyone have any exper= ience
> in using them?
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake <glahiru@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Sachitha,
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Sachith Withana <swsachith@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> There are race condition issues when using the multi-threaded<= br> >>> Orchestrator.
>>>
>> +1, There's another thread we agreed on this. (subject: Orches= tration
>> Component implementation review).
>>
>> Lahiru
>>
>>> =A0We need to come up with a way to synchronize the threads. >>>
>>> Any suggestions?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sachith Withana
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> System Analyst Programmer
>> PTI Lab
>> Indiana University
>>




--
=
Thanks,
Sachith Withana

--089e013d0c7a51aca504f068faf9--