airavata-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Suresh Marru <>
Subject Re: Architecture Mailing List
Date Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:34:10 GMT
I went ahead and requested a list and pointed to this thread. If any one
feels this is not a good idea, please burp now.


From:  Saminda Wijeratne <>
Reply-To:  Airavata Dev <>
Date:  Wednesday, October 30, 2013 at 12:17 AM
To:  Airavata Dev <>
Subject:  Re: Architecture Mailing List

> +1 for an architecture list. Just incase Apache doesn't allow it we could try
> tagging the subject of the mail so that we can use filters.
> For commits there's a separate mailing list[1]. But for jenkin builds the
> mails are directed to the dev list.
> 1.
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura
> <> wrote:
>> +1.
>> Also I would rather that we had another list for build/commit mails (Do we
>> get commit mail at the moment BTW?).
>> Thanks,
>> Danushka
>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Suresh Marru <> wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>> We are getting some architecture input randomly but I guess we are loosing
>>> valuable input from some of the PMC and community who do not have enough
>>> time to develop and catch up heavy dev list traffic but still invaluable to
>>> provide architectural feedback.
>>> How about we request a new mailing list and use it solely for Architecture
>>> discussions? In the long run, I am not sure if we will be able to use this
>>> list and probably will add up confusion of one more additional list. However
>>> we need to make progress on Airavata 1.0 and random 2.0 discussion which get
>>> buried in current active development traffic.
>>> What does ever one think about having such a separate mailing list and
>>> encourage every one from PMC and also from interested users and
>>> representatives from fellow apache projects join the list and contribute? If
>>> it is advisable, we can cc to dev list that way we are not missing any one
>>> at the same time selected members are only getting emails what they would
>>> like.
>>> Thoughts?
>>> Suresh

View raw message