Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airavata.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@airavata.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Subject: Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial
From: Suresh Marru <smarru@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAF4V=3G=H8mTtnsC_KiPw=AQaf_sdtk9GzhmdDNmXh+8bNgMOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:42:35 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <43AB5277-0C49-41AB-9C43-3AD465086E2B@apache.org>
References: <58D260E2-5457-44AD-A630-8EA67494B4A6@apache.org>
 <CAF4V=3FPsx5vz3e03a8pocUv0Ecq8W9ppCDXB44S4XUN7yLK0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJvLytp4XXenxSt_mXnYp4oTPuhUr1BQahY0KHsaGQpbGVgdsg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF4V=3EAAORttegTXLJiGyY=veXZUZPyFi-+1M4AYSj2UtH1og@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF-nVSnnVX_792urpSE1f46hoR8QJa7ixp74q7uQiWo2puA6Yw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOFG5fT99bgOG4yprPnD+aPyj8QERrhB=7h6WajtDRXtEpcAew@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF4V=3GS0169HKoruDcc6rHju5h8craP1nF89NWXHpWtMD3FRA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJvLytqC6-LCmRq=Dx=zuEtCCsut=YJvmgzW0dSnYTChuokM5A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF4V=3GUUPopUkFi3O0g_xVwMF-0cgBUBEnSexdBkPFW7tx2uQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAB3zAY3d9By55ScOaqNNPo=hHzEKn_p=Mf5XPha-42Tbuy-zwA@mail.gmail.com>
 <834B71BA-7CD1-4B60-BD13-4AE33E361B03@apache.org>
 <CAF4V=3G=H8mTtnsC_KiPw=AQaf_sdtk9GzhmdDNmXh+8bNgMOA@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@airavata.apache.org

On Sep 13, 2013, at 2:42 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura =
<danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the =
way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't =
think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates =
feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have =
loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with =
edge/extreme conditions, but would give the impression that we can make =
it perfect when some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I =
believe we can revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean =
post GSoC).

+ 1. By no means its expected all of you will magically solve all the =
challenging technical issues in 2 weeks. But it needs to get to place =
where the code has to work with all known limitations and bring out next =
TODO's.=20

Suresh

>=20
> Thanks,
> Danushka=20
>=20
>=20
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <smarru@apache.org> =
wrote:
> Hi All,
>=20
> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata =
GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects =
and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think =
collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got =
deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to =
have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really =
unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to =
it? Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the =
integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>=20
> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see =
a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all =
patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem =
commits in last weeks.
>=20
> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which =
works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the =
firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline =
closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code =
documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one =
has to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>=20
> Suresh
>=20
> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>=20
> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <subs.zero@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura =
<danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
> >
> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
> >
> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look =
at it too.
> >
> >
> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera =
has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been =
unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
> >
> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at =
all.
> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the =
Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down =
to whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the =
whole this method was unsuccessful.
> >
> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement) =
what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an =
Angular webapp.
> >
> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the =
registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a =
problem that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of =
these will not be easy.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Subho
>=20
>=20