Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CD8210388 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 19:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71396 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2013 19:31:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@airavata.apache.org Received: (qmail 71363 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2013 19:31:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airavata.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@airavata.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@airavata.apache.org Received: (qmail 71348 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2013 19:31:07 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 19:31:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO 149-160-246-211.dhcp-bl.indiana.edu) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username smarru, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 19:31:06 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: [DISCUSS] SVN to GIT for Airavata From: Suresh Marru In-Reply-To: <52E01E85-6677-4F85-974B-ED02B60F2055@apache.org> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 15:31:05 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1FB12D41-78F0-46EB-80EA-EFAA8DEE386A@apache.org> References: <4A88479A-82F7-479F-BD28-AB4728BBD6F7@apache.org> <52E01E85-6677-4F85-974B-ED02B60F2055@apache.org> To: dev@airavata.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) Hi All, One of the items we briefly listed on roadmap [1] is deciding on a SCM = which can go forward. Do we have any strong opinions on SVN Vs GIT? Just = starting a discussion. Suresh [1] - http://markmail.org/thread/5nq7jfk5b7izbip3=