airavata-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shameera Rathnayaka <shameerai...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Suggestions for upcoming releases
Date Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:19:38 GMT
Hi Marlon,

I would like to add my thought on versionning here, Please see my comment
inline.


On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Marlon Pierce <marpierc@iu.edu> wrote:

>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> 0.91 is a real number and it indicates also our intention to release 1.0
> in the near future.  As for GSOC contributions, I would favor having the
> GSOC participants take the lead on any integration, testing, etc with the
> trunk.
>

According to the versionning strategy 0.91 should be a patch release of 0.9
release. Therefore it is kind of misleading IMO. So i am +1 for 0.10
instead of 0.91.

Thanks,
Shameera.


>
> Marlon
>
>
> On 9/30/13 11:04 AM, Amila Jayasekara wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Marlon Pierce <marpierc@iu.edu><marpierc@iu.edu>wrote:
> >
> >>
> > I'd be concerned about the quality of production testing for releasese
> > if we just include an embedded server.  I think Rave hit this
> > problem--everyone tested the simplified version packaged for the
> > release, but there were a lot bugs and other problems that appeared when
> > trying to use it in a more realistic deployment.
> >
> > I think it is better to come up with a packaging strategy that is simple
> > enough for testing but also reasonably realistic.
> >
> >
> > > +1. I am also negative to only release server distribution. Most of the
> > > real deployment scenarios use a separate web server to deploy Airavata.
> > > Further certain functionalities cannot be tested at stand alone
> version.
> > > (E.g :- credential store). Therefore we should keep the war
> distribution.
> >
> > > Anyhow there is a blocking issue [1] for the release related to
> > > distribution size. So we must find a solution for this. (Best thing is
> to
> > > unify war distributions and get rid of duplicate jars)
> >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRAVATA-922
> >
> > > Saminda had been making changes to REST API to incorporate workflow
> > > execution. Are we planning to make that change available in this
> release ?
> > > If so we can get rid of some of SOAP based services. (If this is taking
> > > place we can unify wars also). Saminda please give feedback on this.
> >
> > > Also what about code we inherit from GSOC project ? Are we planning to
> > > incorporate them to release ?
> >
> > > Further for the upcoming release it will be better if we do not include
> > > many features. Because there are couple of lingering Jira tickets
> which we
> > > have been postponing. Its better to fix some of those in hackathon mode
> > > before the release.
> >
> > > @Marlon : Any particular reason why you prefer 0.91 rather than 0.10 ?
> > > (0.10 is what we have assigned right now)
> >
> > > Thanks
> > > Thejaka Amila
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Marlon
> >
> > On 9/30/13 10:30 AM, Raminder Singh wrote:
> > >>> Problem is not releasing both tar and zip. Problem is size of the war
> > distribution file which contain
> > 2 war files (airavata-server.war and airavata-registry.war). Both the
> > war files have lib jars and increase its size more than 100MB. Apache
> > limit of 100MB is per file. I think we should only release tar and zip
> > with embedded server to get started. Creating and deploying of WARs can
> > be documented for production users. WDYT?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks
> > >>> Raminder
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sep 30, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Supun Kamburugamuva
> <supun06@gmail.com> <supun06@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> I've noticed you are releasing both a tar and a zip for all the
> > distribution artifacts. I've seen lot of people only releasing a zip or
> > a tar and not both.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>> Supun..
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Saminda Wijeratne
> > <samindaw@gmail.com> <samindaw@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>> reducing the release footprint should also be a priority IMO.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Raminder Singh
> <rsandhu1@gmail.com> <rsandhu1@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>> Airavata 0.9 is released now and Marlon mentioned a timeline for
1.0
> > is Mid Nov. How do we want to handle next release?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Some of the features required for the projects i work with are:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> GSISSH Provider
> > >>>> Async execution of Applications and implement your own monitor.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Lets discuss a timeline and plan for next release and as well as
for
> > 1.0.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks
> > >>>> Raminder
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Sep 13, 2013, at 3:06 PM, Marlon Pierce <marpierc@iu.edu><marpierc@iu.edu>wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hi all--
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Airavata 0.9 is pending, we also would like to have 1.0 in
time for
> > >>>>> Supercomputing 2013 (November 15th), and we have been trying
to get
> > down
> > >>>>> to ~6 week releases.  We have 9 weeks until SC13.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I suggest we do the following:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> * Get 0.9 out over the next couple of days. There are no blocking
> > issues.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> * Define 0.91 or 0.10 release next week and target completion
in 4
> for
> > >>>>> ~October 11th.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> * Define and complete 1.0 release for November 15th.  The primary
> goal
> > >>>>> for 1.0 is to have the API stable.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Marlon
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Supun Kamburugamuva
> > >>>> Member, Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org
> > >>>> E-mail: supun06@gmail.com;  Mobile: +1 812 369 6762
> > >>>> Blog: http://supunk.blogspot.com
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSSZmZAAoJEOEgD2XReDo5PyMH/0sBqjLWZDAw2hEWbE41VvVC
> Jb5VLpgy6iBAqT8nJxRCy1tO22tB/t0SYOT1NVV/LaUMFrqNM1/lCK8ru251Gf4/
> a0c4nCMeR+ItLo6uCLSfIC90plNmc2NOHbmiFGNbZCtSfVEnDVo86oVF/OxahLZs
> 9csQ6bkeZWhNCm98WRDEhGQzSaHpu7qyyL9IGO2spOwPafDQvpiP7jf587h15vSj
> LfK2Fcf00X8ZIgJBQD5E9//iiBCDQyFW/9WQWV3Mz2UWKJktkA6wMJG2JO5PKcxK
> Haj4zyxaYfioN3k+CTyce+5+UyK0tr80qwvHzHsIc81ZrfViaCwZ2Ds6VlJt9qs=
> =m+hz
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Shameera Rathnayaka.

email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/

Mime
View raw message