airavata-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shameera Rathnayaka <shameerai...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial
Date Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:24:18 GMT
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> +1 for the approach.
>
> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello world"
> workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect solution
> and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have a running
> workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
>
> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>

+1 for 11 PM.


>
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to have a
>> hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the master
>> project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to request
>> to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from now, as
>> i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>
>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shameera
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the
>>> way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think
>>> it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates
>>> feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have
>>> loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme
>>> conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when
>>> some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can
>>> revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Danushka
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <smarru@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata
>>>> GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects
>>>> and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think
>>>> collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>
>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see a
>>>> small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all patches
>>>> in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in last
>>>> weeks.
>>>>
>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which
>>>> works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm
>>>> pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely,
>>>> the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test
>>>> coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard
>>>> to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>
>>>> Suresh
>>>>
>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>> >
>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>>>> >
>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look at
>>>> it too.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera has
>>>> written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been unsuccessful
>>>> at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>> >
>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at
>>>> all.
>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the
>>>> Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down
to
>>>> whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole
>>>> this method was unsuccessful.
>>>> >
>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement)
>>>> what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an
>>>> Angular webapp.
>>>> >
>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the
>>>> registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem
>>>> that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will
>>>> not be easy.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Cheers,
>>>> > Subho
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>
>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Shameera Rathnayaka.

email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/

Mime
View raw message