airavata-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Subho Banerjee <subs.z...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial
Date Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:18:15 GMT
Hi,
I have a class till 1pm CST. Which I guess is like 11pm IST. Could we talk
around that time (I will join by 1.15 CST)?

Cheers,
Subho.


On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to have a
> hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the master
> project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to request
> to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from now, as
> i have some issue in being present after that time.
>
> Hope to meet you all in there.
>
> Thanks,
> Shameera
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the way
>> forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think it
>> has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates feasibility
>> of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have loopholes, a lot of
>> room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme conditions, but would
>> give the impression that we can make it perfect when some additional effort
>> put in. If we can get there, I believe we can revisit and take it further
>> from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Danushka
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <smarru@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata GSoC
>>> projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects and a
>>> collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think
>>> collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>
>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see a
>>> small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all patches
>>> in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in last
>>> weeks.
>>>
>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which
>>> works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm
>>> pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely,
>>> the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test
>>> coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard
>>> to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>
>>> Suresh
>>>
>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>
>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>> >
>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>>> >
>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look at
>>> it too.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera has
>>> written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been unsuccessful
>>> at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>> >
>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at
>>> all.
>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the
>>> Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to
>>> whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole
>>> this method was unsuccessful.
>>> >
>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement)
>>> what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an
>>> Angular webapp.
>>> >
>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the
>>> registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem
>>> that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will
>>> not be easy.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Subho
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>
> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>



-- 
Cheers,
Subho

Mime
View raw message