Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C26FA10848 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:59:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87025 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2013 13:59:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@airavata.apache.org Received: (qmail 86923 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2013 13:59:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airavata.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@airavata.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@airavata.apache.org Received: (qmail 86913 invoked by uid 99); 29 Aug 2013 13:59:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:59:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [129.79.1.188] (HELO hartman.uits.indiana.edu) (129.79.1.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:59:47 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,983,1367985600"; d="scan'208";a="60449493" Received: from mssg-relay.indiana.edu ([129.79.1.73]) by irpt-internal-relay.indiana.edu with ESMTP; 29 Aug 2013 09:59:24 -0400 Received: from hartman.uits.indiana.edu (hartman.uits.indiana.edu [129.79.1.194]) by mssg-relay.indiana.edu (8.14.5/8.14.4/IU Messaging Team) with ESMTP id r7TDxLFo006432 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:59:24 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,983,1367985600"; d="scan'208";a="60449445" Received: from burns.uits.indiana.edu (HELO mail-relay.iu.edu) ([129.79.1.202]) by irpt-internal-relay.indiana.edu with ESMTP; 29 Aug 2013 09:59:13 -0400 Received: from 156-56-179-234.dhcp-bl.indiana.edu (156-56-179-234.dhcp-bl.indiana.edu [156.56.179.234]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail-relay.iu.edu (8.14.5/8.14.4/IU Messaging Team) with ESMTP id r7TDxDU8017475 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:59:13 -0400 Message-ID: <521F53B1.3000804@iu.edu> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:59:13 -0400 From: Marlon Pierce User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@airavata.apache.org Subject: Re: Roadmap to Airavata 1.0 References: <4A88479A-82F7-479F-BD28-AB4728BBD6F7@apache.org> <521F5012.7010600@iu.edu> <83DEA29C-40A2-41D8-A3EC-2EF741B3A985@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <83DEA29C-40A2-41D8-A3EC-2EF741B3A985@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm +1 for setting SC13 as a goal. It is a big opportunity since this is when the e-science and cyberinfrastructure community will all be together. But let's hear from everybody. Is Airavata 1.0 by SC13 achievable? Marlon On 8/29/13 9:49 AM, Suresh Marru wrote: > On Aug 29, 2013, at 9:43 AM, Marlon Pierce > wrote: > > Looks like a good list. What is the time frame? SC13 and December > 31 are two candidate dates to aim for. > >> I like both these dates. How about we target SC 13 [1] , i.e. >> November 15th for a 1.0 release? and before end of year for >> working with various users in upgrading to 1.0 version. That we >> enter the new year, freshly returned from holidays with a target >> for Airavata 2.0. > >> Suresh [1] - http://sc13.supercomputing.org/ > > > > Marlon > > > On 8/29/13 9:39 AM, Suresh Marru wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> In the last 2 years Airavata has evolved significantly and I >>>> feel we are about the time to stabilize the Airavata Access >>>> Layer through a API and make a 1.0 release. Here are some >>>> thoughts on what we need to do before Airavata can be 1.0: >>>> >>>> * Ready to move into semantic versioning of releases * Have a >>>> API which will survive through minor releases and only calls >>>> out for API changes for major releases * Decide upon a going >>>> forward SCM among SVN or GIT * Have well documented client >>>> integration examples * Scrub of any unused dependencies and >>>> revisit the latest versions of critical dependencies * Agree >>>> upon supported features * Remove any third party maven repos >>>> (down to 1 as of today) * Resolve all the issues which are >>>> bugs (and preferably improvements as well) * Revisit all wish >>>> style issues and comment on the ones planned to be addressed >>>> in near future. * External review of the project by >>>> soliciting developers from fellow apache projects. >>>> >>>> Additional thoughts and tasks we need to accomplish before >>>> 1.0? >>>> >>>> Suresh >>>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSH1OwAAoJEOEgD2XReDo5uqgH/2HlGW1/i2ZQsC6a6SVmoqox zcqwooLMwwDuaQvI1w3oZVFdcwNi5SBnRvazDwJY+iqvo1avxZ43EjBhSzrUk1hZ zi6CntUG0wLS9sx8nbueoY05faV1+wJRJ5aRsyNfft6MOEdZQA0/rxM94hO5w71N joqq6dZ2A1igmWKUB9WenGsIh96UV+pmO8wGFi9swy86DmczJcwyF8txpxmJxNIg dwdTmFR6Gi8WQ2SZc3MHrMu8HByjwlKIH6Zv23R/TfVvieIenpd6tK6ZEuHH8ajI D08T6AJKGsd4aR/KAU75rwo25hBFg1lA+wy8E7+N+pI5NdEz5Cx3dNkU4qI2Pw8= =2KyM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----