Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 105E1CFA9 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 16:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21182 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2013 16:08:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-airavata-dev-archive@airavata.apache.org Received: (qmail 21075 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2013 16:08:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@airavata.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@airavata.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@airavata.apache.org Received: (qmail 21066 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2013 16:08:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 16:08:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of samindaw@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.52] (HELO mail-la0-f52.google.com) (209.85.215.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 16:08:13 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id fo12so5664262lab.25 for ; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 09:07:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=QJLXOkesvJExTBYxl4zZx9emB+jNaErjlZjWmdFvRhE=; b=RNsXxGWLR7O+nxxmwuYnUuY2E1iWSASx4NFwnVEQdPYwBWvDXzbY/HeLKPqcmOe9J8 DKH5XgQvyFNiRsUkcB05y+XcCL+Ra2i3xGEjQqMuyUSxVB/RDCBna7v4vjAWZF6jq4JD 9MXJZHiN6fF7Wn4S4P8WjWp5V944pTf8SmXRDnoqPYqqHbPqig7vk4TI1JnKegJAIKnw 80HuTivyuvhSx8TqGoE9J6s/w0RLT0OkZII8FttMzQvKrHHZ8zFZ4U+D1uTTelgRbVe4 m4Nb9S9nPf0QS2JksBVokz2Uv2YEoeIIRtKjSRtMQDwz2dDNNlcJ52qVBvXEAUMEbKfK blMQ== X-Received: by 10.152.170.138 with SMTP id am10mr14836986lac.22.1372781271914; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 09:07:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.50.131 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 09:07:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <2EEEEF8E-819A-4DA8-A34A-4BE229F29BCF@apache.org> <8B5D14EA-524D-4BCA-9889-8D940A5B703F@apache.org> From: Saminda Wijeratne Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:07:31 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GSoC] Registry side JSON implementation. To: dev@airavata.apache.org, viknesb Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0117721311228a04e0898c00 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0117721311228a04e0898c00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The slides, https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1v2BBHJYTMJ8qJ4emReR0UBIme3h_LuNJjGMUaoVIhuM/edit#slide=id.gef340dc3_0156 On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Saminda Wijeratne wrote: > this is the hangout url > https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/d00a36670639c25200b314bf2d04f7345e5c335c?authuser=0 > let me know if you need to be added. > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Saminda Wijeratne wrote: > >> The hangout session will start at 10:15am EST. Will send out the hangout >> url 5 minutes before it starts (provided my linux machine complies). >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Saminda Wijeratne wrote: >> >>> Great. See you at that time then. Like Suresh said I'll create the >>> hangout session just before the session starts and send out the list to >>> this mail thread. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Viknes Balasubramanee wrote: >>> >>>> +1 for July 2nd 10am EST. >>>> >>>> Viknes >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Suresh Marru [mailto:smarru@apache.org] >>>> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 9:55 AM >>>> To: dev@airavata.apache.org >>>> Subject: Re: [GSoC] Registry side JSON implementation. >>>> >>>> On Jun 28, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Saminda Wijeratne >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Yep lets do it next week. Does July 2nd 10am EST work for anyone who >>>> > wants to join in the discussion? Or suggest another date/time please. >>>> >>>> + 1, I will join in as well. My experience with pre-scheduled google >>>> hangout >>>> on the air was not good. So I suggest you start the hangout on air few >>>> minutes before the schedule and send a link to the list. >>>> >>>> Suresh >>>> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka >>>> > >>> >> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> Hi Suresh, >>>> >> >>>> >> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Suresh Marru >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>> Hi Shameera >>>> >>> >>>> >>> I would have been surprised if the API did not confuse you and >>>> others. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Hi Saminda, >>>> >>> >>>> >>> I think your recent API discussions were useful but I do not think >>>> >>> they are still conveying the story. Can we have a google hangout and >>>> >> brainstorm >>>> >>> and also have a WIKI documentation on the API? >>>> >>> >>>> >> >>>> >> +1 , It would be great if we can have a google hangout for this as i >>>> >> +have >>>> >> come to difficult state of development. >>>> >> >>>> >> Thanks, >>>> >> Shameera. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Thanks, >>>> >>> Suresh >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On Jun 28, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> As i am done with workflow interpreter, now i am working with >>>> >>>> registry side. Here i have some concerns >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 1. With my observation , registry rest api already can work with >>>> >>>> json >>>> >> but >>>> >>>> inside the rest api it uses airavata java client api to do the >>>> >>>> actual invocation (registry rest api is wirtten by wrapping >>>> >>>> airavata java >>>> >> client >>>> >>>> API). Seems it will be required to improve airavata java client to >>>> >>>> work with json in this case. This can be done by introducing JAXB >>>> >>>> to JSON convertion layer same as JAXB to XML layer. It would be >>>> >>>> good to know thoughts on this scenario to know whether i am doing >>>> >>>> right thing here >>>> >> or >>>> >>>> in wrong path. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2. Is airavata java client an axis2 client?, I am bit confused >>>> >>>> about >>>> >>> this. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 3. As we discussed it is required to store JSON instead of XML in >>>> >>> database, >>>> >>>> Seems this is required more effort and need more changes. are we >>>> >>>> going >>>> >> do >>>> >>>> this now ? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Any thoughts and feedbacks on following things are more than >>>> welcome. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Shameera. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> >>>> Shameera Rathnayaka. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com Blog : >>>> >>>> http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/ >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> -- >>>> >> Best Regards, >>>> >> Shameera Rathnayaka. >>>> >> >>>> >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com Blog : >>>> >> http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/ >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > --089e0117721311228a04e0898c00--