airavata-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Amila Jayasekara <thejaka.am...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: GSOC Progress?
Date Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:03:30 GMT
Thanks Sanchit for explaining the structure. As discussed in previous mail
I will add test directory to root folder.
Test cases welcome.

Thanks
Amila


On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Amila
>
> The explanation of structure is as follows.
>
> /:.
> ├───index.html ... This is the main xbay UI file,as we are building the 1
> page application                                layout of all
> interfaces(workflow composer,execution
>                  interface,messenger) will reside in this.
> ├───css           .... This folder will contain all the stylesheets, the
> one provided by the 3                                parties like (twitter
> bootstrap etc) wil go to vendor folder, and one
>        customized by us will be at the root of css folder.
>     └───vendor
> ├───doc           ....  all the documentation for the interfaces
>
> ├───img          .....  all the images like logos,icons etc
>
> └───js             ....  custom js will be at the root of js folder
>     ├───vendor  .... all 3rd party lib like
> jquery,angular,bootstrap.js,jsv.js etc will go here
>     ├───model   ....  all js code, dealing with application data
>     └───controlers   .. all js code ,affecting the application behavior
>
>
>
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Amila,
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Amila Jayasekara <
>> thejaka.amila@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Below svn structure is now in
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/airavata/sandbox/gsoc2013.
>>>
>>> Also may I know what you meant by "vendor" ?
>>>
>>
>> AFAIK, all 3rd party js files goes to there, eg: jquery.js​
>>
>>
>> Further where are you going to place  tests cases in below svn structure ?
>>>
>>
>> ​What about create a top level directory called "test" for all test cases?
>>
>>>
>>> When submitting patches please let us know where to place code.
>>>
>>> @Shameera : I see you have submitted a js file as a patch to [1]. Please
>>> let me know where to place the file in below svn structure
>>>
>> ​​
>> ​I think registryAPI.js file should go to js directory. ​And
>> registryRestService.patch for trunk
>>
>>
>>> and great if you can submit test cases for that as well.
>>>
>>
>> ​Sure Amila I will provide test cases for this.​
>>
>> @Subho could you please explain the structure.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shameera.
>>
>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRAVATA-887
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Amila
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> As discussed and suggested by subho lets have the html5 boilerplate
>>>> structure.
>>>>
>>>> /:.
>>>> ├───index.html
>>>> ├───css
>>>>     └───vendor
>>>> ├───doc
>>>> ├───img
>>>> └───js
>>>>     ├───vendor
>>>>     ├───model
>>>>     └───controlers
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Suresh Marru <smarru@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hi All,
>>>> >
>>>> > This is indeed great progress. + 1 for regular hangouts amongst
>>>> yourself.
>>>> > And please call out when ever you need help with a specific component
>>>> and
>>>> > we can join in as well.
>>>> >
>>>> > Guys, please *no* for a separate repository. We have so many active
>>>> > committers and you should have your contributions committed to gsoc
>>>> sandbox
>>>> > with minimal latency. We can commit and then review to GSOC sandbox,
>>>> for
>>>> > trunk it will be review and commit so it will be slow.
>>>> >
>>>> > So please suggest a directory strictly and contribute to repos. As
>>>> part of
>>>> > Apache GSOC we are required to teach contributing patches and working
>>>> in
>>>> > this setting.
>>>> >
>>>> > Suresh
>>>> >
>>>> > On Jul 9, 2013, at 2:48 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Hi all,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > The session was great and cleared most of the confusion.Apart from
>>>> the
>>>> > > above points it was also decided
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 5. To have a common repository on Git as it easy to merge there.Let
>>>> one
>>>> > of
>>>> > > us create the repo and all others just fork it.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 6. Also lets define the different stubs as discussed so that
>>>> everyone can
>>>> > > use them.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Regards
>>>> > > Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>> > > danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > >> Hi all,
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> We had a quite fruitful session that helped iron out some of
the
>>>> issues
>>>> > >> that we had. It was decided to have hangout sessions at regular
>>>> > intervals
>>>> > >> to help keep the momentum and have everyone on the same page.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> It was decided to have the following action plan for next week.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> 1. Danushka : Submit a patch for the Airavata/AMQP client API
>>>> (initial
>>>> > >> cut).
>>>> > >> 2. Shameera : Submit a patch for the protocol conversion JS
API
>>>> (initial
>>>> > >> cut).
>>>> > >> 3. Vijayendra : Submit a patch for the monitoring implementation
>>>> based
>>>> > on
>>>> > >> pub/sub.
>>>> > >> 4. Subho : Discuss the directory structure for UI on dev@ and
>>>> submit a
>>>> > >> patch for  workflow composition UI (initial cut).
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Guys, please add whatever that I have missed.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Cheers,
>>>> > >> Danushka
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>> > >> shameerainfo@gmail.com
>>>> > >>> wrote:
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>> Hi,
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> In that Hangout we can come to final svn repo structure
too, I
>>>> have
>>>> > some
>>>> > >>> code in my local machine and better move it to a safe location.
I
>>>> have
>>>> > >>> written JS client interface to call set of registry rest
api
>>>> > resources, I
>>>> > >>> have tested and it is working), once this finish ( will
finish
>>>> ASAP)
>>>> > >> others
>>>> > >>> can use that for their development.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Thanks,
>>>> > >>> Shameera.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>> > >>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>> Hi Amila,
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>> Sure I will.
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>> Danushka
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Amila Jayasekara <
>>>> > >>> thejaka.amila@gmail.com
>>>> > >>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>>> Hi Danushka,
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>> If you can publish hangout URL to dev list, some
of the people
>>>> in dev
>>>> > >>>> list
>>>> > >>>>> may also be able to join (if available).
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>> Thanks
>>>> > >>>>> Amila
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura
<
>>>> > >>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>> Suresh,
>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>> We are planning to have a hangout session tonight
(IST). I will
>>>> > >> keep
>>>> > >>>> the
>>>> > >>>>>> list updated after that.
>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers,
>>>> > >>>>>> Danushka
>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Suresh Marru
<
>>>> smarru@apache.org>
>>>> > >>>> wrote:
>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>> The spike of enthusiasm quickly spurred
down. Am i looking in
>>>> the
>>>> > >>>> wrong
>>>> > >>>>>>> svn repo and JIRA, Airavata ones do not
show any gsoc
>>>> > >> contributions
>>>> > >>>>> yet.
>>>> > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>> Suresh
>>>> > >>>>>>> On Jun 23, 2013, at 8:43 AM, Suresh Marru
<smarru@apache.org>
>>>> > >>> wrote:
>>>> > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>> Did all the students gave up on GSOC
projects and decided to
>>>> > >> fail
>>>> > >>>> the
>>>> > >>>>>>> mid-term?
>>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>> This is unusually quite period when
it is supposed to be high
>>>> > >>>> coding
>>>> > >>>>>>> time with atleast 30 -40 hours of coding.
Other than sporadic
>>>> > >>>>> questions,
>>>> > >>>>>> I
>>>> > >>>>>>> have not seen any concrete plan yet.
>>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>> Suresh
>>>> > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> --
>>>> > >>> Best Regards,
>>>> > >>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>> > >>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>
>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message